Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Colfer (1999)
The BAG: basic assessment guide for human well-being
J. Manor (2004)
User Committees: A Potentially Damaging Second Wave of Decentralisation?The European Journal of Development Research, 16
R. Fisher, R. Prabhu, C. McDougall (2007)
Introduction: people, forests and the need for adaptation
C. Blackmore (2007)
What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overviewEnvironmental Science & Policy, 10
Paul Nadasdy (2007)
Adaptive Co-Management and the Gospel of Resilience
M. Turshen (2001)
Development as FreedomJournal of Public Health Policy, 22
J. Pretty (1995)
Participatory learning for sustainable agricultureWorld Development, 23
S. Osmani (2008)
Participatory Governance: An Overview of Issues and Evidence
B. Agarwal (2001)
Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual FrameworkWorld Development, 29
D. Armitage, R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R. Arthur, A. Charles, I. Davidson-Hunt, A. Diduck, Nancy Doubleday, D. Johnson, M. Marschke, P. McConney, Evelyn Pinkerton, E. Wollenberg (2009)
Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexityFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7
M. Banjade (2015)
Social capital, conflict, and adaptive collaborative governance: exploring the dialecticEcology and Society, 20
Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Relocating participation within a radical politics of development Journal Article How to cite:
P. Steyaert, J. Jiggins (2007)
Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practiceEnvironmental Science & Policy, 10
(2002)
Wheelbarrows full of frogs: Social learning in rural resource management. The Netherlands: Koninklijke Van Gorcum
R. Plummer (2009)
The Adaptive Co-Management Process: an Initial Synthesis of Representative Models and Influential VariablesEcology and Society, 14
Nicole Peterson (2011)
Excluding to include: (Non)participation in Mexican natural resource managementAgriculture and Human Values, 28
M Leach (2002)
Adaptive management: from theory to practice
Y. Malla (2001)
Changing Policies and the Persistence of Patron-Client Relations in Nepal: Stakeholders' Responses to Changes in Forest PoliciesEnvironmental History, 6
SR Arnstein (1969)
A ladder of citizen participationJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 35
D. Selener (1997)
Participatory action research and social change
C McDougall, C Khadka, S Dangol (2007)
Negotiated learning: Collaborative monitoring in forest resource management
(2010)
Global forest resources assessment 2010: Nepal country report. Rome: Forest Resources Assessment Programme/Forestry Department
J. Cochran, I. Ray (2009)
Equity Reexamined: A Study of Community-Based Rainwater Harvesting in Rajasthan, IndiaWorld Development, 37
P. Lachapelle, P. Smith, S. Mccool (2004)
Access to Power or Genuine Empowerment? An Analysis of Three Community Forest Groups in NepalHuman Ecology Review, 11
J Manor (2005)
Democratic decentralization through a natural resource lens
C. McDougall, J. Jiggins, B. Pandit, Sushila Rana, C. Leeuwis (2013)
Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal's Community ForestsSociety & Natural Resources, 26
D. Russell (2007)
The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty and Adaptive Collaborative Management, 27
M. Leach (2011)
Plural Perspectives and Institutional Dynamics: Challenges for Community Forestry
(2003)
Is community forestry in contemporary Nepal pro-poor and sustainable? Policy process and analysis paper 1: Improving policy-livelihood relationships in South Asia
RK Yin (2009)
Case study research: Design and methods
Ravi Prabhu (1999)
The Grab bag: supplementary methods for assessing human well-being
Joachim Ahrens, Rolf Caspers, Janina Weingarth (2011)
Good Governance in the 21st CenturyResearch Papers in Economics
C. McDoughal, C. Khadka, S. Dangol (2007)
Using monitoring as leverage for equal opportunity in Nepal
R. Prabhu, C. McDougall, R. Fisher (2007)
Adaptive collaborative management: a conceptual model
(2002)
Wheelbarrows full of frogs: Social learning in rural resource management
E. Wollenberg, J. Anderson, C. Lopez (2005)
Though all things differ: pluralism as a basis for cooperation in forests
C. McDougall, H. Ojha, M. Banjade, B. Pandit, Tara Bhattarai, M. Maharjan, S. Rana (2008)
Forests of learning: Experiences from research on an Adaptive Collaborative Approach to community forestry in Nepal
N. Röling (2002)
Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences : moving from multiple to distributed cognition in resource dilemmas
A. Salim, C. Colfer, C. McDougall (1999)
Scoring and analysis guide for assessing human well-being
R Prabhu, C McDougall, R Fisher (2007)
Adaptive collaborative management of community forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia, and the Philippines
(2010)
Global forest resources assessment 2010: Nepal country report
(2009)
Evaluating citizen engagement in policy making
(2006)
Unequal citizens: Gender, caste, and ethnic exclusion in Nepal
(2004)
Twenty-five years of community forestry: Contribution to millenium development goals
M. Nurse, Y. Malla, P. Gyamtsho, B. Singh, G. Rasul (2006)
Advances in community forestry in Asia.
P Nadasdy (2007)
Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance
S Hickey, G Mohan (2005)
Relocating participation within a radical politics of developmentDevelopment and Change, 36
Forests are a significant component of integrated agriculture-based livelihood systems, such as those found in many parts of Asia. Women and the poor are often relatively dependent on, and vulnerable to changes in, forests and forest access. And yet, these same actors are frequently marginalized within local forest governance. This article draws on multi-year, multi-case research in Nepal that sought to investigate and address this marginalization. Specifically, the article analyzes the influence of adaptive collaborative governance on the engagement of women and the poor in community forestry decision making. A description of adjustments to governance processes and arrangements is followed by the consequent changes in engagement observed, in terms of: efforts made by female and poor members to be involved, express views and exercise rights; leadership roles played by female and poor members; and the extent to which the user groups’ priorities and actions reflect the marginalized members’ interests and needs. The main finding is that the engagement of women and the poor increased across sites with the shift from the status quo to adaptive collaborative governance, although not without challenges. The article explores interconnected factors underlying the changes, then considers these through the lens of the “three-gap analysis of effective participation.” This leads to specific insights concerning the conceptualization and strengthening of engagement in community forestry including the central roles of power and learning.
Agriculture and Human Values – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 8, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.