Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Meelis (1982)
Egg distribution of insect parasitoids: a survey of modelsActa Biotheoretica, 31
C. Holling (1959)
The Components of Predation as Revealed by a Study of Small-Mammal Predation of the European Pine SawflyThe Canadian Entomologist, 91
W. Fiske (1910)
Superparasitism: an Important Factor in the Natural Control of InsectsJournal of Economic Entomology, 3
FJ Simmonds (1956)
Superparasitism by Spalangia drosophilaeAshm Bull Entomol Res, 47
D. Griffiths (1977)
Models for Avoidance of SuperparasitismJournal of Animal Ecology, 46
J. Maindonald, N. Markwick (1986)
The avoidance of superparasitism in four species of parasitic wasp—Mathematical models and experimental resultsResearches on Population Ecology, 28
K. Bakker, H. Eijsackers, J. Lenteren, E. Meelis (1972)
Some models describing the distribution of eggs of the parasitePseudeucoila bochei (Hym., Cynip.) over its hosts, larvae ofDrosophila melanogasterOecologia, 10
H. Mcbrien, M. Mackauer (1990)
Heterospecific larval competition and host discrimination in two species of aphid parasitoids: Aphidius ervi and Aphidius smithiEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 56
J. Rabasse, M. Steenis (1999)
Biological Control of Aphids
C. Holling (1959)
Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and ParasitismThe Canadian Entomologist, 91
WR Thomson (1924)
La théorie mathématique de l’action des parasites entomophages et le facteur du hazardAnn Fac Sci Marseille, Ser, 11
D. Griffiths (1977)
Avoidance-modified generalised distributions and their application to studies of superparasitism.Biometrics, 33 1
M. Faddy (1997)
Extended Poisson Process Modelling and Analysis of Count DataBiometrical Journal, 39
D. Daley, J. Maindonald (1989)
A Unified View of Models Describing the Avoidance of SuperparasitismMathematical Medicine and Biology-a Journal of The Ima, 6
T Hofsvang, EB Hågvar (1983)
Functional responses to prey density of Ephedrus cerasicola (Hym.: Aphidiidae), an Aphidiid parasitoid of Myzus persicae (Hom.: Aphididae)Entomophaga, 28
M. Gullino, R. Albajes, P. Nicot (2020)
Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse CropsIntegrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops
D. Rogers (1975)
A MODEL FOR AVOIDANCE OF SUPERPARASITISM BY SOLITARY INSECT PARASITOIDSJournal of Animal Ecology, 44
K. Bakker, S. Bagchee, W. Zwet, E. Meelis (1967)
HOST DISCRIMINATION IN PSEUDEUCOILA BOCHEI (HYMENOPTERA: CYNIPIDAE)Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10
R. Arditi, O. Glaizot (1995)
Assessing superparasitism with a model combining the functional response and the egg distribution of parasitoidsEntomophaga, 40
E. Hågvar, T. Hofsvang (1986)
Parasitism by Ephedrus cerasicola (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) developing in different stages of Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae)
Cox Pdf (1977)
The Theory Of Stochastic ProcessesThe Mathematical Gazette, 61
M. Steenis, K. El-Khawass (1995)
Life history of Aphis gossypii on cucumber: influence of temperature, host plant and parasitismEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 76
J. Guldemond, W. Brink, E. Belder (1998)
Methods of assessing population increase in aphids and the effect of growth stage of the host plant on population growth ratesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 86
B. Bai, M. Mackauer (1992)
Influence of Superparasitism on Development Rate and Adult Size in a Solitary Parasitoid Wasp, Aphidius erviFunctional Ecology, 6
F. Simmonds (1956)
Superparasitism by Spalangia drosophilae AshmBulletin of Entomological Research, 47
E. Hågvar, T. Hofsvang (1986)
Parasitism byEphedrus cerasicola [Hym.: Aphidiidae] developing in different stages ofMyzus persicae [Hom.: Aphididae]Entomophaga, 31
T. Hofsvang, E. Hågvar (1983)
Functional responses to prey density ofEphedrus cerasicola [Hym.: Aphidiidae], an aphidiid parasitoid ofMyzus persicae [Hom.: Aphididae]Entomophaga, 28
L. Hemerik, N. Hoeven, J. Alphen (2002)
Egg Distributions and the Information a Solitary Parasitoid has and Uses for its Oviposition DecisionsActa Biotheoretica, 50
A simple numerical procedure is presented for the problem of estimating the parameters of models for the distribution of eggs oviposited in a host. The modelling is extended to incorporate both host density and time dependence to produce a remarkably parsimonious structure with only seven parameters to describe a data set of over 3,000 observations. This is further refined using a mixed model to accommodate several large outliers. Both models show that the level of superparasitism declines with increasing host density, and the rate declines over time. It is proposed that the differing behaviours represented by the mixed model may reflect a balance between behavioural strategies of different selective benefit.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 25, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.