Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2018)
Petersburg: comparative analysis
Yu. Ershov (2012)
Spatial aspect of the Russian economy and prospects of its development: Before and after the crisisRegional Research of Russia, 2
(2018)
Macroeconomic effects of structural changes in the regional economics, Reg.: Ekon
(2018)
Economic and budgetary advantages of Moscow: how are they formed and used
(2017)
Strukturno-investitsionnaya politika v tselyakh obespecheniya ekonomicheskogog rosta v Rossii (Structural-Investment Policy to Support the Economic Growth in Russia
(2009)
The economic crisis in Russia: expert view
(2018)
Budgets of Moscow and St. Petersburg: comparative analysis, in Staraya i Novaya Moskva: tendentsii i problemy razvitiya (Old and New Moscow: Trends and Development)
N. Zubarevich (2016)
Crises in post-Soviet Russia: Regional projectionRegional Research of Russia, 6
J. Esteban (2000)
Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: a shift-share analysisRegional Science and Urban Economics, 30
(2016)
Russian economy: before long transition, Vopr
(2015)
Spatial development strategy after the crisis: from large projects to institutional modernization
D. Nauriyal, B. Sahoo (2011)
Financial CrisisThe Indian Economic Journal, 58
D. Knudsen (2000)
Shift-share analysis: further examination of models for the description of economic changeSocio-economic Planning Sciences, 34
(2016)
Moscow as an object of federal regional policy
(2012)
Rent of the capital status
(2016)
Russian economy: from stagnation to recession
Alexander Granberg, N. Mikheeva, Yu. Ershov, V. Kuleshov, V. Seliverstov, V. Suslov, S. Suspitsyn, Pavel Minakir (2011)
The impact of the global crisis on the strategy of spatial socio-economic development of the Russian federationRegional Research of Russia, 1
S. Dubinin (2015)
Financial Crisis 2014-2015Journal of the New Economic Association, 26
(2019)
Economic growth and investment activity in Russia: forecasts and reality
P. Minakir (2018)
Russian Crisis: Expectations Against FactsSpatial Economics, 1
(2018)
Prospective economic development of Russia
(2008)
Regional proportions of economic growth in Russia
(2018)
Three crises in one scenario
The article considers the main features of the economic crises of 1998, 2009, and 2015; analyzes the dynamics of the main indicators of regional socioeconomic development in crisis conditions and at its terminal stage. It is shown that all crises are caused by structural factors: imbalances in the sectoral structure, weak financial sector, and weak institutions. An export-oriented model of the economy has proved unstable to external shocks. In all cases, the crisis-related decline began with the regions that most dependent on the external economic situation, with metropolitan areas and oil and gas producing regions. However, a deeper decline in production and slow economic recovery were observed in regions oriented toward domestic Russian demand. After the 2009 crisis, the range of fluctuations in growth rates decreased in all federal districts. The decline in production during the crisis has become smaller; however, the subsequent rise has not been high. The article assesses the impact of national trends and regional features of the production structure on regional economic dynamics. It is shown that crisis conditions amplify interregional differentiation of growth rates and the value of regional factors increases. The contribution of regional factors determines the stability of the economy to crisis-related shocks. The shares of the distribution of income between households and businesses are considered, since a change in these determines consumer and investment demand dynamics. It is shown that revenue redistribution in favor of business is not a factor in investment growth. The regional structure of investment demand is not directly related to the regional structure of business revenue. A peculiarity of the 2015 crisis is that adaptation of final demand to external shocks and depreciation of the ruble after devaluation occurred by contraction of both investment and consumer demand. The real sector of the economy shows the greatest resilience to the crisis; precrisis industrial indicators in 2018 were exceeded in all federal districts.
Regional Research of Russia – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 7, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.