Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M Imo (2000)
10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00091-2For Ecol Manag, 126
JW Lehmkuhler, EED Felton, DA Schmidt, KJ Bader, HE Garrett, MS Kerley (2003)
Tree protection methods during the silvopastoral-system establishment in midwestern USA: cattle performance and tree damageAgrofor Syst, 59
VD Nair, PKR Nair, RS Kalmbacher, IV Ezenwa (2007)
Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse-textured soils of Florida, USAEcol Eng, 29
PM McEvoy, JH McAdam, MR Mosquera-Losada, A Rigueiro-Rodrıguez (2006)
Tree regeneration and sapling damage of pedunculate oak Quercus robur in a grazed forest in Galicia, NW Spain: a comparison of continuous and rotational grazing systemsAgrofor Syst, 66
JK Blackshaw (1994)
10.1071/EA9940285Aust J Exp Agric, 34
ME Biondini (1998)
10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0469:GIAEPI]2.0.CO;2Ecol Appl, 8
CM Feldhake (2002)
10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00058-8Agric For Meteorol, 112
BD Patton (2007)
10.2111/07-008R2.1Rangeland Ecol Manag, 60
S Allen (2004)
10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047732.95283.acPlant Soil, 263
I Noy-Meir (1993)
Compensating growth of grazed plants and its relevance to the use of rangelandsEcol Appl, 3
JW Lehmkuhler (2003)
10.1023/A:1026184902984Agrofor Syst, 59
T Mathew, BM Kumar, KVS Babu, K Umamaheswaran (1992)
Comparative performance of some multipurpose trees and forage species in silvopastoral systems in the humid regions of southern IndiaAgrofor Syst, 17
JW Lehmkuhler, MS Kerley, HE Garrett, BE Cutter, RL Mc-Graw (1999)
Comparison of continuous and rotational silvopastoral systems for established walnut plantations in southwest Missouri, USAAgrofor Syst, 44
M Noordwijk, G Lawson, A Soumaré, JJR Groot, K Hairiah (1996)
Tree–crop interactions: a physiological Approach
FM Mitlohner (2001)
10.2527/2001.7992327xJ Anim Sci, 79
RL Kallenbach, MS Kerley, GJ Bishop-Hurley (2006)
Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a Pine-Walnut SilvopastureAgrofor Syst, 66
MR Rao, PKR Nair, CK Ong (1998)
Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systemsAgrofor Syst, 38
FP Gardner, BB Pearce, RL Mitchell (1985)
Physiology of crop plants
RA Dahlgren, MJ Singer, X Huang (1997)
Oak tree and grazing impacts on soil properties and nutrients in a California oak woodlandBiogeochemistry, 39
VD Nair (2007)
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.07.003Ecol Eng, 29
C Giraldo (2011)
10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00112.xInsect Conserv Divers, 4
B Chu (2010)
10.1007/s10457-009-9273-3Agrofor Syst, 79
S Jose (2009)
Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overviewAgrofor Syst, 76
S Allen, S Jose, PKR Nair, BJ Brecke (2004)
Competition for 15 N labeled nitrogen in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system in the southern United StatesPlant Soil, 263
JW Lehmkuhler (1999)
10.1023/A:1006206929983Agrofor Syst, 44
FM Mitlohner, JL Morrow, JW Dailey, SC Wilson, ML Galyean, MF Miller, JJ McGlone (2001)
Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattleJ Anim Sci, 79
T Mathew (1992)
10.1007/BF00054148Agrofor Syst, 17
MA Gold, HE Garrett (2009)
North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice
JP Grime (1973)
Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetationNature, 242
S Jose, R Williams, D Zamora (2006)
Belowground ecological interactions in mixed-species forest plantationsFor Ecol Manag, 233
AJ Belsky, SM Mwonga, RG Amundson, JM Duxbury, AR Ali (1993)
Comparative effects of isolated trees on their undercanopy environments in high-and low-rainfall savannasJ Appl Ecol, 30
ES Bendfeldt (2001)
10.1023/A:1013367224860Agrofor Syst, 53
MA Hamza, WK Anderson (2005)
Soil compaction in cropping systems—a review of the nature, causes and possible solutionsSoil Till Res, 82
M Imo, VR Timmer (2000)
Vector competition analysis of a Leucaena-maize alley cropping system in western KenyaFor Ecol Manag, 126
WJA Payne (1985)
A review of the possibilities for integrating cattle and tree crop production in the tropicsFor Ecol Manag, 12
S Jose (2009)
10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7Agrofor Syst, 76
BK Northup (2005)
10.1007/s10457-004-0002-7Agrofor Syst, 65
I Noy-Meir (1993)
10.2307/1941787Ecol Appl, 3
RC Hawley, PW Stickel (1948)
Forest protection
SJ George, BM Kumar, PA Wahid, NV Kamalam (1996)
Root competition for phosphorus between the tree and herbaceous components of silvopastoral systems in Kerala, IndiaPlant Soil, 179
SH Sharrow (2007)
Soil compaction by grazing livestock in silvopastures as evidenced by changes in soil physical propertiesAgrofor Syst, 71
CH Lin, KW Goyne, RJ Kremer, RN Lerch, HE Garrett (2010)
Dissipation of sulfamethazine and tetracycline in the root zone of grass and tree speciesJ Environ Qual, 39
SC Allen, S Jose, PKR Nair, BJ Brecke, P Nkedi-Kizza (2004)
Safety net role of tree roots: experimental evidence from an alley cropping systemFor Ecol Manag, 192
PM McEvoy (2006)
10.1007/s10457-005-2916-0Agrofor Syst, 66
DM Broom, FA Galindo, E Murgueitio (2013)
Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animalsProc R Soc B, 280
F Cubbage (2012)
10.1007/s10457-012-9482-zAgrofor Syst, 86
MR Mosquera-Losada, E Fernandez-Nunez, A Rigueiro-Rodrıguez (2006)
Pasture, tree and soil evolution in silvopastoral systems of Atlantic EuropeFor Ecol Manag, 232
RS Seymour, AS White (2002)
Natural disturbance regimes in northeastern North America—evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequenciesFor Ecol Manag, 155
RL Kallenbach (2006)
10.1007/s10457-005-6640-6Agrofor Syst, 66
BM Kumar, SJ George, TK Suresh (2001)
Fodder grass productivity and soil fertility changes under four grass + tree associations in Kerala, IndiaAgrofor Syst, 52
SJ McNaughton (1993)
Grasses and grazers, science and managementEcol Appl, 3
MI Ferraz-de-Oliveira (2016)
10.1007/s10457-016-9900-8Agrofor Syst, 90
TT Kozlowski (1986)
Soil aeration and growth of forest trees (review article)Scand J For Res, 1
ES Bendfeldt, CM Feldhake, JA Burger (2001)
Establishing trees in an Appalachian silvopasture: response to shelters, grass control, mulch, and fertilizationAgrofor Syst, 53
HNL Houerou (1987)
Agroforestry: a decade of development
MA Hamza (2005)
10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009Soil Till Res, 82
S Jose (2000)
10.1023/A:1006241406462Agrofor Syst, 48
EJ Holzmueller, S Jose, MA Jenkins, A Camp, AJ Long (2006)
Dogwood anthracnose in eastern hardwood forests: what is known and what can be done?J Forest, 104
SJ McNaughton (1993)
10.2307/1941782Ecol Appl, 3
MI Dyer, CL Turner, TR Seastedt (1993)
Herbivory and its consequencesEcol Appl, 3
BK Northup, JR Brown, AJ Ash (2005)
Grazing impacts on spatial distribution of soil and herbaceous characteristics in an Australian tropical woodlandAgrofor Syst, 65
TT Kozlowski (1986)
10.1080/02827588609382405Scand J For Res, 1
SH Sharrow (1999)
Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems
RS Seymour (2002)
10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00572-2For Ecol Manag, 155
DM Broom (2013)
10.1098/rspb.2013.2025Proc R Soc B, 280
AJ Belsky (1993)
10.2307/2404278J Appl Ecol, 30
BM Kumar (2001)
10.1023/A:1010756018265Agrofor Syst, 52
S Jose, AR Gillespie, JR Seifert, DB Mengel, PE Pope (2000)
Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the mid-western USA. 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamicsAgrofor Syst, 48
J Orefice, RG Smith, J Carroll, H Asbjornsen, T Howard (2016)
Forage productivity and profitability in newly-established open pasture, silvopasture, and thinned forest production systemsAgrofor Syst
CM Feldhake (2002)
Forage frost protection potential of conifer silvopasturesAgric For Meteorol, 112
J Blondel (2006)
The ‘design’ of mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the historic periodHum Ecol, 34
NR St-Pierre (2003)
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74040-5J Dairy Sci, 86
B Chu, KW Goyne, SH Anderson, CH Lin, RP Udawatta (2010)
Veterinary antibiotic sorption to agroforestry buffer, grass buffer, and cropland soilsAgrofor Syst, 79
TR Clason, SH Sharrow (2000)
Silvopastoral practices. North American Agroforestry: an integrated science and practice
NR St-Pierre, B Cobanov, G Schnitkey (2003)
Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industriesJ Dairy Sci, 86
EJ Holzmueller (2007)
10.1007/s11104-006-9151-yPlant Soil, 290
SH Sharrow (2001)
Effects of shelter tubes on hardwood tree establishment in western Oregon silvopasturesAgrofor Syst, 53
U Karki (2015)
10.1007/s10457-014-9768-4Agrofor Syst, 89
J Blondel (2006)
10.1007/s10745-006-9030-4Hum Ecol, 34
WJA Payne (1985)
10.1016/0378-1127(85)90133-1For Ecol Manag, 12
WM Rogers, DR Kirby, PE Nyren, BD Patton, ES Dekeyser (2005)
Grazing intensity effects on Northern plains mixed-grass prairiePrairie Nat, 37
MR Mosquera-Losada (2006)
10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.057For Ecol Manag, 232
CH Lin (2010)
10.2134/jeq2009.0346J Environ Qual, 39
S Jose (2006)
10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.014For Ecol Manag, 233
MR Rao (1998)
10.1023/A:1005971525590Agrofor Syst, 38
F Montagnini, PKR Nair (2004)
Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systemsAgrofor Syst, 61
BD Patton, X Dong, PE Nyren, A Nyren (2007)
Effects of grazing intensity, precipitation, and temperature on forage productionRangeland Ecol Manag, 60
EJ Holzmueller, S Jose, MA Jenkins, S Jose (2007)
Influence of calcium, potassium, and magnesium on Cornus florida L. density and resistance to dogwood anthracnosePlant Soil, 290
CH Lin (1999)
10.1023/A:1006205116354Agrofor Syst, 44
SC Allen (2004)
10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.009For Ecol Manag, 192
SH Sharrow (2001)
10.1023/A:1013319308930Agrofor Syst, 53
S Jose, AR Gillespie, SG Pallardy (2004)
New vistas in agroforestry
RA Dahlgren (1997)
10.1023/A:1005812621312Biogeochemistry, 39
ME Biondini, BD Patton, PE Nyren (1998)
Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed-grass prairie, USAEcol Appl, 8
CH Lin, RL McGraw, MF George, HE Garrett (1999)
Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practicesAgrofor Syst, 44
SJ George (1996)
10.1007/BF00009328Plant Soil, 179
DC Dey, GB MacDonald (2001)
Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario
JK Blackshaw, AW Blackshaw (1994)
Heat stress in cattle and the effect of shade on production and behaviour: a reviewAust J Exp Agric, 34
C Giraldo, F Escobar, JA Chará, Z Calle (2011)
The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian AndesInsect Conserv Divers, 4
BB Lin (2010)
The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystemsAgric For Meteorol, 150
J Orefice (2016)
10.1007/s10457-016-0052-7Agrofor Syst
SH Sharrow (2007)
10.1007/s10457-007-9083-4Agrofor Syst, 71
JP Grime (1973)
10.1038/242344a0Nature, 242
U Karki, MS Goodman (2015)
Microclimatic differences between mature loblolly-pine silvopasture and open-pastureAgrofor Syst, 89
BB Lin (2010)
10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.010Agric For Meteorol, 150
MI Dyer (1993)
10.2307/1941781Ecol Appl, 3
MI Ferraz-de-Oliveira, C Azeda, T Pinto-Correia (2016)
Management of Montados and Dehesas for high nature value: an interdisciplinary pathwayAgrofor Syst, 90
J Orefice (2016)
10.1007/s10457-016-0040-yAgrofor Syst
WJA Payne (1990)
An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics
F Cubbage, G Balmelli, A Bussoni, E Noellemeyer, AN Pachas, H Fassola, L Colcombet, B Rossner, G Frey, F Dube, ML Silva, H Stevenson, J Hamilton, W Hubbard (2012)
Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the worldAgrofor Syst, 86
TT Kozlowski, SG Pallardy (1997)
Physiology of woody plants
Ranjith P. Udawatta, Shibu Jose (2011)
Advances in Agroforestry
J Orefice, RG Smith, J Carroll, H Asbjornsen, D Kelting (2016)
Soil and understory plant dynamics during conversion of forest to silvopasture, open pasture, and woodlotAgrofor Syst
Silvopastoral systems are sustainable production systems characterized by greater biodiversity and multifunctionality, compared with other livestock production methods. The complex functional dynamics, however, make silvopastoralism a difficult construct to design and study. The key design criterion for these complex land use practices is to optimize the use of spatial, temporal, and physical resources, by maximizing positive interactions (facilitation) and minimizing negative ones (competition) among the components, for which the principles of sustainable land use systems are relevant. In this paper we address the cardinal questions, how the general ecological principles common to complex natural systems apply to the design and management of silvopastoral systems and how sound management might be identified with the notion of sustained maximum yield. In particular, we explore (1) spatial and temporal heterogeneity for maximizing resource use efficiency, (2) competitive interactions in perennial systems, (3) structural and functional diversity for resource conservation, and (4) integration of the principles of disturbance ecology in silvopastoral system design.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 6, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.