Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Lillian Belmont H. Birch (1965)
Latera dominance, lateral awareness, and reading disabilityChild Development, 36
J. Piaget (1963)
The origins of intelligence in children, New York (W W Norton) 1963.
Maud A. Merrill (1937)
Measuring Intelligence
Marie Hoosan (1965)
Just enough EnglishReading Teacher, 18
Marion Monroe (1935)
Reading aptitude tests for the prediction of success and failure in beginning readingEducation, 56
H. Werner (1957)
The Concept of Development
J. Piaget (1952)
The Origins of Intelligence in Children
P. Schilder, L. Bender (1964)
Contributions to Developmental NeuropsychiatryArchives of Disease in Childhood, 41
Cynthia Deutsch R. Coleman (1964)
Lateral dominance and right-left discrimination: A comparison of normal and retarded readersPerceptual &, 19
A. Gesell (1940)
The First Five Years of Life
L. Belmont, H. Birch (1965)
LATERAL DOMINANCE, LATERAL AWARENESS, AND READING DISABILITY.Child development, 36
Richard Coleman, C. Deutsch (1964)
Lateral Dominance and Right-Left Discrimination: A Comparison of Normal and Retarded ReadersPerceptual and Motor Skills, 19
Martin Deutsch (1965)
THE ROLE OF SOCIAL CLASS IN LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND COGNITION.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 35
M. McGraw (1945)
The Neuromuscular Maturation of the Human Infant
A. Fabian (1951)
Clinical and experimental studies of school children who are retarded in readingQuarterly Journal of Child Behavior, 3
A. Gesell (1945)
—
VOL. XVI BULLETIN OF THE ORTON SOCIETY 1966 PART I ARTICLES EARLY PREDICTION OF READING FAILURE * ** ~ by Katrina de Hirsch, F.C.S.T., Jeanette J. Jansky, M.S. and William S. Langford, M.D. Department of Pediatric Psychiatry, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center Prediction of reading success or failure has been the objective of a number of both clinical and more formal studies. Among the statistical investigations, some have taken single variables, such as auditory discrimination, visuo-motor competence, anxiety level or self-concept as measured in kindergarten or early first grade, in order to predict reading competence 9-12 months later. A few have constructed a battery of predictive tests -- one of the best was Monroe's. Our own investigation differs from others in three important respects: it explores a far larger section of the child's perceptuo- motor and linguistic organization than do other studies, it predicts spelling and writing in addition to reading achievement, and finally the interval between prediction and outcome is more than twice as long as it is in most other studies. Schools have, of course, informally assessed children's read- iness for years and they have by and large relied on three types of evaluation: on reading-readiness tests, on determination
Annals of Dyslexia – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 1966
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.