Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects

Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects Dynamic fusion Focus ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects C.Y. Barrey Neurosurger y (C) and Spine Surger y, P Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices civils, Lyon, France Biomechanics Laborator y, ENSAM (Arts et Métiers - ParisTech), Paris, France INTRODUCTION screw-based PDS concern the concept of dynamic stabilization Surgery for low back pain due to degenerative disc disease and/or without fusion. A Pubmed computer search using the following facet arthritis can be divided into three main options (Fig. 1): keywords: “lumbar dynamic instrumentation and fusion” and – Limitation of motion (i.e. dynamic stabilization using motion- “Dynamic fusion and lumbar spine” was performed. A total of preserving devices); 47 papers on dynamic instrumentation were found, including – Restoration of motion (i.e. involving disc/facets replacement 22 clinical reports, 14 biomechanical studies and 5 reviews. All implants); the articles involving pedicle screw-based PDS focused on the – And intervertebral fusion (considered as the gold standard). concept of dynamic stabilization but none on dynamic fusion. Each option requires specific and adequate instrumentation to The objective of the current paper is to clarify the concept of achieve the aim of the surgery. dynamic instrumentation for fusion and to repor t http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png ArgoSpine News & Journal Springer Journals

Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects

Barrey, Cédric
ArgoSpine News & Journal , Volume 22 (2) – Sep 1, 2010
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/dynamic-instrumentation-for-fusion-with-isobar-ttl-biomechanical-and-0Vkm9P0ycM
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by ARGOS and Springer-Verlag France
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Surgical Orthopedics; Diagnostic Radiology
ISSN
1957-7729
eISSN
1957-7737
DOI
10.1007/s12240-010-0014-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Dynamic fusion Focus ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects C.Y. Barrey Neurosurger y (C) and Spine Surger y, P Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices civils, Lyon, France Biomechanics Laborator y, ENSAM (Arts et Métiers - ParisTech), Paris, France INTRODUCTION screw-based PDS concern the concept of dynamic stabilization Surgery for low back pain due to degenerative disc disease and/or without fusion. A Pubmed computer search using the following facet arthritis can be divided into three main options (Fig. 1): keywords: “lumbar dynamic instrumentation and fusion” and – Limitation of motion (i.e. dynamic stabilization using motion- “Dynamic fusion and lumbar spine” was performed. A total of preserving devices); 47 papers on dynamic instrumentation were found, including – Restoration of motion (i.e. involving disc/facets replacement 22 clinical reports, 14 biomechanical studies and 5 reviews. All implants); the articles involving pedicle screw-based PDS focused on the – And intervertebral fusion (considered as the gold standard). concept of dynamic stabilization but none on dynamic fusion. Each option requires specific and adequate instrumentation to The objective of the current paper is to clarify the concept of achieve the aim of the surgery. dynamic instrumentation for fusion and to repor t

Journal

ArgoSpine News & Journal – Springer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2010

References

  • Usefulness of intervertebral titanium cages for PLIF and posterior fixation with semi-rigid Isolock plates. Instrumented fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine: state of the art, questions and controversies
    Perrin, G.
  • Hinged-dynamic posterior device permits greater loads on the graft and similar stability as compared with its equivalent rigid device: a three-dimensional finite element assessment
    Goel, V.K.; Konz, R.J.; Chang, H.T.; Grosland, N.M.; Grobler, L.J.; Chesmel, K.D.
  • alternative to lumbar and lumbo-sacral fusion
    Mazel, C.; Mitulescu, A.; Balabaud, L.; Antonietti, P.
  • Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine
    Barrey, C.Y.; Ponnappan, R.K.; Song, J.; Vaccaro, A.R.
  • Dynamic Stabilization Devices for the Lumbar Spine
  • Longitudinal element size effect on load sharing, internal loads, and fatigue life of tri-level spinal implant constructs
    Duffield, R.; Carson, W.; Chen, L.; Voth, B.
  • Comparison between two different concepts of lumbar posterior osteosynthesis implants. A finite element analysis
    Templier, A.; Denninger, L.; Mazel, C.; Lavaste, F.; Skalli, W.
  • Basic science of spinal instrumentation
    Goel, V.K.; Gilbertson, L.G.
  • The Law of Bone Remodeling
    Wolff, J.
  • A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for Clinicians
    Frost, H.M.
  • A comparison of stress-induced porosity due to conventional and a modified spinal fixation device
    Lim, T.H.; Goel, V.K.; Winterbottom, J.M.; Kessler, B.; Ahn, J.Y.; Gwon, J.K.; Park, J.B.; Weinstein, J.N.
  • Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of soft stabilization
    Mulholland, R.C.; Sengupta, D.K.
  • Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain
    Sengupta, D.K.
  • The biomechanics of posterior motion preservation systems
    Wright, T.; Tauber, M.; Meyers, K.; Sudin, Y.; Arnin, U.; Girardi, F.
  • Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery
    Huang, R.C.; Girardi, F.P.; Lim, M.R.; Cammisa, F.P.
  • Biomechanics of non-fusion implants
    Huang, R.C.; Wright, T.M.; Panjabi, M.M.; Lipman, J.D.
  • In dynamic reconstruction of the spine
    McNally, D.S.
  • Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices
    Khoueir, P.; Kim, A.; Wang, M.Y.
  • Multidirectional stability of the graf system
    Strauss, P.J.; Novotny, J.E.; Wilder, D.G.; Pope, M.H.
  • Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions
    Rohlmann, A.; Neller, S.; Bergmann, G.; Graichen, F.; Claes, L.; Wilke, H.J.
  • Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study
    Niosi, C.A.; Zhu, Q.; Wilson, D.C.; Keynan, O.; Wilson, D.R.; Oxland, T.R.
  • Influence of a dynamic stabilization system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure
    Schmoelz, W.; Huber, J.F.; Nydegger, T.; Claes, L.; Wilke, H.J.
  • Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis
    Rohlmann, A.; Burra, N.K.; Zander, T.; Bergmann, G.
  • Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion
    Cheng, B.C.; Gordon, J.; Cheng, J.; Welch, W.C.
  • The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint Contact Forces
    Niosi, C.A.; Wilson, D.C.; Zhu, Q.; Keynan, O.; Wilson, D.R.; Oxland, T.R.
  • Quantitative analysis in outcome assessment of instrumented lumbosacral arthrodesis
    Champain, S.; Mazel, C.; Mitulescu, A.; Skalli, W.
  • Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain
    Lazennec, J.Y.; Ramare, S.; Arafati, N.; Laudet, C.G.; Gorin, M.; Roger, B.; Hansen, S.; Saillant, G.; Maurs, L.; Trabelsi, R.
  • Unfavorable influence of the dynamic neutralisation system on the sagittal balance
    Legaye, J.
  • lumbar and lumbo-sacral fusion alternatives
    Skalli, W.; Champain, S.; Mosnier, T.
  • Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases
    Barrey, C.Y.; Jund, J.; Noseda, O.; Roussouly, P.
  • Fusion and failure following anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: 6-months results of a multi-centric, prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Stulik, J.; Rainer Pitzen, T.; Chrobok, J.; Ruffing, S.; Drumm, J.; Sova, L.; Kucera, R.; Vyskocil, T.; Ingo Steudel, W.