Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Elnicki, R. Kolarik, I. Bardella (2003)
Third‐Year Medical Students' Perceptions of Effective Teaching Behaviors in a Multidisciplinary Ambulatory ClerkshipAcademic Medicine, 78
Enrico Coiera (1998)
Medical informatics meets medical educationMedical Journal of Australia, 168
A. Rotem, N. Glasman (1979)
On the Effectiveness of Students’ Evaluative Feedback to University InstructorsReview of Educational Research, 49
F. Yaris, G. Can, M. Topbas, Y. Ozoran (2001)
Students’ opinions on medical education in Karadeniz Technical University Medical SchoolJournal of Ondokuz Mayis University Medical School, 18
L. Aleamoni (1999)
Student Rating Myths Versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13
R.J. Wlodkowski (1999)
Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn
Leonid Gercenshtein, Y. Fogelman, J. Yaphe (2002)
Increasing the satisfaction of general practitioners with continuing medical education programs: A method for quality improvement through increasing teacher-learner interactionBMC Family Practice, 3
Z. Akturk, N. Dağdeviren, E. Şahi̇n, C. Ozer (2002)
Use of quality circles among first year medical students and impact on student satisfaction.Swiss medical weekly, 132 11-12
T. Stratton, D. Witzke, R. Jacob, M. Sauer, A. Murphy-Spencer (2002)
Medical Students' Ratings of Faculty Teaching in a Multi-Instructor Setting: An Examination of Monotonic Response PatternsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 7
C. Dommeyer, P. Baum, Robert Hanna (2002)
College Students' Attitudes Toward Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: In-Class Versus On-LineJournal of Education for Business, 78
Michael Koller, Rolf Grütter, Michael Peltenburg, Joachim Fischer, Johann Steurer (2001)
Use of the Internet by medical doctors in Switzerland.Swiss medical weekly, 131 17-18
M Vernooij-Dassen, P Ram, W. Brenninkmeijer, L Franssen, B. Bottema, C. Vleuten, R. Grol (2000)
Quality assessment in general practice trainers.Medical Education, 34
S. Bogdewic (1998)
Innovations in faculty development.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 73 11
P. Stillman, M. Gillers, M. Heins, G. Nicholson, D. Sabers (1983)
Effect of immediate student evaluations on a multi-instructor course.Journal of medical education, 58 3
Alice Speer, Elnicki Dm (1999)
Assessing the quality of teaching.The American journal of medicine, 106 4
D. Price, B. Miflin, P. Mudge, C. Jackson (1994)
The quality of medical teaching and learning in rural settings: the learner's perspectiveMedical Education, 28
D. Irby, G. Gillmore, P. Ramsey (1987)
Factors affecting ratings of clinical teachers by medical students and residents.Journal of medical education, 62 1
J. Matthes, Bent Marxen, Ralph-Mario Linke, W. Antepohl, S. Coburger, H. Christ, W. Lehmacher, S. Herzig (2002)
The influence of tutor qualification on the process and outcome of learning in a problem-based course of basic medical pharmacologyNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, 366
L. Wilkerson, D. Irby (1998)
Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty developmentAcademic Medicine, 73
Howard Wachtel (1998)
Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: a brief reviewAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23
N. Munoz-paraiso (1976)
Teacher training evaluation.Options for policy and practice, 2 4
O. Sarikaya, M.A. Gulpinar, D. Keklik, S. Kalaca (2002)
Hear the students: Evaluation of the education by the studentsMedical Education World, 9
Background: Student feedback is a valuable method to evaluate the quality of education. Using a WEB-based questionnaire, the objective of this study was to evaluate the factors that may affect the ratings given by the students and the impact of those ratings on the instructor’s teaching performance. Methods: The questionnaire was organized into four areas: containment, presentation skills, measurement and assessment, and communication skills. In addition, there was a final area in which the students could express their opinions about their instructor. The students were asked to rank their instructors in each of the four areas using a scale of 1–5. In both May 2002 and 2003, the students ranked their instructors using the WEB-based questionnaire. Results: In 2002, 468 students evaluated 146 instructors; while in 2003, 360 students evaluated 144 instructors. Of the total number of instructors evaluated, 140 were evaluated both in 2002 and 2003. The mean point scores for these 140 instructors were 3.64 ± 0.51 in 2002 and 3.65 ± 0.54 in 2003. There was no statistically significant difference according to the titles of the instructors. For both 2002 and 2003, regarding the last section in the questionnaire where students could present their opinions, 80 of the students, indicated the instructors had communication problems. All instructors with low scores were mentioned to have poor communication skills. The changes in the mean point scores were evaluated comparing results from 2002 and 2003. Fourteen professors, four associate professors, three assistant professors, two lecturers were found to have higher scores, three professors, seven associate professors, five assistant professors, and one lecturer were found to have lower scores. Conclusion: No significant improvement was found in the mean points of the total group. In the second year, only 16.4 of the instructors were affected positively.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 5, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.