Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/do-cancer-patients-fully-understand-clinical-trial-participation-a-01KtHAJFCJ
References (21)
-
P. Hietanen, A. Aro, K. Holli, P. Absetz (2000)
Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial.European journal of cancer, 36 16
-
N. Aaronson, E. Visser-Pol, G. Leenhouts, M. Muller, A. schot, F. Dam, R. Keus, C. Koning, W. Huinink, J. Dongen, R. Dubbelman (1996)
Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 14 3
-
C. Daugherty (2004)
Ethical Issues in the Development of New AgentsInvestigational New Drugs, 17
-
K. Schutta, C. Burnett (2000)
Factors that influence a patient's decision to participate in a phase I cancer clinical trial.Oncology nursing forum, 27 9
-
M. Schaeffer, David Krantz, A. Wichman, H. Masur, E. Reed, J. Vinicky (1996)
The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research.The American journal of medicine, 100 3
-
(1998)
Taking Part in Clinical Trials: What Cancer Patients Need To Know [booklet] -
B. Rimer, Bernard Glassman (1999)
Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication?Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 25
-
David Farrell, B. Rimer, Laura Olevitch, L. Brennan, M. Kreuter (1999)
Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology -
A. November (2003)
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 21 12
-
M Holmes-Rovner, J Kroll, N Schmitt (1996)
Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The Satisfaction with Decision ScaleMedical Decis Making, 16
-
P. Ellis (2000)
Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 11 8
-
S. Joffe, E. Cook, P. Cleary, Jeffrey Clark, J. Weeks (2001)
Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93 2
-
K. Cox (2002)
Informed consent and decision-making: patients' experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials.Patient education and counseling, 46 1
-
M. McCabe (1999)
The ethical foundation of informed consent in clinical research.Seminars in oncology nursing, 15 2
-
G. Huizinga, D. Sleijfer, H. Wiel, W. Graaf (1999)
Decision-making process in patients before entering phase III cancer clinical trials: a pilot study.Cancer nursing, 22 2
-
M. Holmes-Rovner, J. Kroll, N. Schmitt, D. Rovner, M. Breer, M. Rothert, G. Padonu, G. Talarczyk (1996)
Patient Satisfaction with Health Care DecisionsMedical Decision Making, 16
-
D. Stacey, F. Légaré, N. Col, Carol Bennett, M. Barry, K. Eden, M. Holmes-Rovner, H. Llewellyn-Thomas, A. Lyddiatt, R. Thomson, L. Trevena, Julie Wu (2003)
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2
-
C. Coyne, R. Xu, P. Raich, K. Plomer, M. Dignan, L. Wenzel, D. Fairclough, T. Habermann, Linda Schnell, S. Quella, D. Cella (2003)
Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 21 5
-
Sarah Edwards, R. Lilford, Jenny Hewison (1998)
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionalsBMJ, 317
-
S. Joffe, S. Joffe, E. Cook, P. Cleary, Jeffrey Clark, J. Weeks, J. Weeks (2001)
Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 358
-
Katie Featherston, J. Donovan (1998)
Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 317
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 by American Association for Cancer Education
- Subject
- Biomedicine; Cancer Research; Pharmacology/Toxicology
- ISSN
- 0885-8195
- eISSN
- 1543-0154
- DOI
- 10.1007/BF03174370
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Background. Accepted practices of informed consent often result in suboptimal patient understanding of research studies.Methods. This pilot study aimed to assess trial-specific tailored materials, compared to a widely used generic booklet about clinical trials, randomly assigned to 118 candidates for cancer clinical trials. Study outcomes were: satisfaction with decision-making; satisfaction with materials; and subjective understanding of the clinical trial.Results. There were no major differences between groups. Participants rated tailored materials higher as a useful reference.Conclusions. Trial-specific materials hold utility for reference during clinical trials. Studies of informed consent are feasible, although important factors limit research.
Journal
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 16, 2009