Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Distributed backup placement

Distributed backup placement We consider the Backup Placement problem in networks in the CONGEST\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathcal {CONGEST}$$\end{document} distributed setting. Given a network graph G=(V,E)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$G = (V,E)$$\end{document}, the goal of each vertex v∈V\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$v \in V$$\end{document} is selecting a neighbor, such that the maximum number of vertices in V that select the same vertex is minimized. The backup placement problem was introduced by Halldorsson, Kohler, Patt-Shamir, and Rawitz, who obtained in 2015 an O(logn/loglogn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$O(\log n/ \log \log n)$$\end{document} approximation with randomized polylogarithmic time. Their algorithm remained state-of-the-art for general graphs, as well as for specific graph topologies. In the current paper, we obtain significantly improved algorithms for various graph topologies. Specifically, we show that O(1)-approximation to optimal backup placement can be computed deterministically in O(1) rounds (and even just one round) in wireless networks, certain social networks, claw-free graphs, and, more precisely, in any graph with neighborhood independence bounded by a constant. We also consider graphs such as trees, forests, planar graphs and, more precisely, graphs of constant arboricity. For such graphs, we obtain constant approximation to optimal backup placement in O(logn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$O(\log n)$$\end{document} deterministic rounds. Clearly, our constant-time algorithms for graphs with constant neighborhood independence are asymptotically optimal. Moreover, we show that our algorithms for graphs with constant arboricity are not far from optimal as well by proving several lower bounds. Specifically, in unoriented trees, optimal backup placement requires Ω(logn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Omega (\log n)$$\end{document} time and polylogarithmic-approximate backup placement requires Ω(logn/loglogn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Omega (\sqrt{\log n / \log \log n})$$\end{document} time. These lower bounds are applicable in particular to graphs of constant arboricity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Distributed Computing Springer Journals

Distributed backup placement

Distributed Computing , Volume 35 (5) – Oct 1, 2022

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/distributed-backup-placement-UdmdzBrfkU
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022
ISSN
0178-2770
eISSN
1432-0452
DOI
10.1007/s00446-022-00423-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We consider the Backup Placement problem in networks in the CONGEST\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathcal {CONGEST}$$\end{document} distributed setting. Given a network graph G=(V,E)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$G = (V,E)$$\end{document}, the goal of each vertex v∈V\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$v \in V$$\end{document} is selecting a neighbor, such that the maximum number of vertices in V that select the same vertex is minimized. The backup placement problem was introduced by Halldorsson, Kohler, Patt-Shamir, and Rawitz, who obtained in 2015 an O(logn/loglogn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$O(\log n/ \log \log n)$$\end{document} approximation with randomized polylogarithmic time. Their algorithm remained state-of-the-art for general graphs, as well as for specific graph topologies. In the current paper, we obtain significantly improved algorithms for various graph topologies. Specifically, we show that O(1)-approximation to optimal backup placement can be computed deterministically in O(1) rounds (and even just one round) in wireless networks, certain social networks, claw-free graphs, and, more precisely, in any graph with neighborhood independence bounded by a constant. We also consider graphs such as trees, forests, planar graphs and, more precisely, graphs of constant arboricity. For such graphs, we obtain constant approximation to optimal backup placement in O(logn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$O(\log n)$$\end{document} deterministic rounds. Clearly, our constant-time algorithms for graphs with constant neighborhood independence are asymptotically optimal. Moreover, we show that our algorithms for graphs with constant arboricity are not far from optimal as well by proving several lower bounds. Specifically, in unoriented trees, optimal backup placement requires Ω(logn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Omega (\log n)$$\end{document} time and polylogarithmic-approximate backup placement requires Ω(logn/loglogn)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Omega (\sqrt{\log n / \log \log n})$$\end{document} time. These lower bounds are applicable in particular to graphs of constant arboricity.

Journal

Distributed ComputingSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 2022

Keywords: Backup placement; Wireless networks; Graph theory

References