Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Dendoncker, Fanny Boeraeve, Emilie Crouzat, M. Dufrêne, A. König, C. Barnaud (2018)
How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitionsEcology and Society, 23
B. Pokorny, Wil Jong, Javier Godar, P. Pacheco, James Johnson (2013)
From large to small: reorienting rural development policies in response to climate change, food security and povertyForest Policy and Economics, 36
G. Martín (2015)
A conceptual framework to support adaptation of farming systems – Development and application with Forage RummyAgricultural Systems, 132
M. Reed, A. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, Jayne Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, Bradley Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, L. Stringer (2010)
What is social learningEcology and Society, 15
L. Lewan, T. Söderqvist (2002)
Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern SwedenEcological Economics, 42
(2005)
Agroecology and the search for a truly sustainable agriculture. United Nations Environmental Programme, Environmental Training Network for .
Gregory Verutes, Amy Rosenthal (2014)
Research Article: Using Simulation Games to Teach Ecosystem Service Synergies and Trade-offsEnvironmental Practice, 16
P. Lamarque, P. Meyfroidt, B. Nettier, S. Lavorel (2014)
How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers' Decision-MakingPLoS ONE, 9
W. Geertsema, W. Rossing, D. Landis, F. Bianchi, P. Rijn, J. Schaminée, T. Tscharntke, W. Werf (2016)
Actionable knowledge for ecological intensification of agricultureFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14
Frédérique Jankowski (2013)
Les typologies traditionnelles sont-elles fonctionnelles ? Recherche participative et connaissance locale des sols au SénégalRevue D'anthropologie Des Connaissances
P. Edwards, Lisa Sharma-Wallace, A. Wreford, Lania Holt, Nicholas Cradock-Henry, Stephen Flood, S. Velarde (2019)
Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: a review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interfaceEnvironmental Research Letters, 14
R. Costanza, Karim Chichakly, V. Dale, S. Farber, D. Finnigan, Kathie Grigg, S. Heckbert, I. Kubiszewski, Harry Lee, Shuang Liu, P. Magnuszewski, S. Maynard, Neal McDonald, R. Mills, S. Ogilvy, P. Pert, Jochen Renz, L. Wainger, Michael Young, C. Ziegler (2014)
Simulation games that integrate research, entertainment, and learning around ecosystem servicesEcosystem services, 10
(2008)
Desenvolvimento sustentável na Amazônia: o papel estratégico do campesinato
F. Rives, M. Antona, S. Aubert (2012)
Research, part of a Special Feature on Public policies and management of rural forests: lasting alliance or fool's dialogue? Social-ecological Functions and Vulnerability Framework to Analyze Forest Policy Reforms
K. Giller, E. Witter, M. Corbeels, P. Tittonell (2009)
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' viewField Crops Research, 114
M. Etienne (2010)
Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable DevelopmentCompanion Modelling
Ignacio Palomo, M. Felipe‐Lucia, E. Bennett, B. Martín‐López, U. Pascual (2016)
Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-ProductionAdvances in Ecological Research, 54
Gregory Verutes, Amy Rosenthal (2014)
Using Simulation Games to Teach Ecosystem Service Synergies and Trade-offs
Clémence Moreau, C. Barnaud, R. Mathevet (2019)
Conciliate Agriculture with Landscape and Biodiversity Conservation: A Role-Playing Game to Explore Trade-Offs among Ecosystem Services through Social LearningSustainability
Antonio Resque, E. Coudel, M. Piketty, Nathalie Cialdella, Tatiana Sá, M. Piraux, W. Assis, Christophe Page (2019)
Agrobiodiversity and Public Food Procurement Programs in Brazil: Influence of Local Stakeholders in Configuring Green Mediated MarketsSustainability
É. Perrier (2018)
Que peut apporter la co-construction d'un jeu dans le cadre d'un projet de recherche interdisciplinaire ? Suivi d'un processus de modélisation d'accompagnement sur les trajectoires de restauration forestière par les agriculteurs familiaux à Irituia en Amazonie orientale
G. Villamor, Ignacio Palomo, C. Santiago, E. Oteros‐Rozas, Joe Hill (2014)
Assessing stakeholders' perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methodsEcological Processes, 3
Antonio Resque, M. Piketty, E. Coudel, S. Messad, Christophe Page (2021)
Co-production of ecosystem services through agricultural practices: perception of stakeholders supporting smallholders in the Brazilian AmazonCahiers Agricultures
L. Mattos, A. Romeiro (2010)
Decisões sobre usos da terra e dos recursos naturais na agricultura familiar amazônica = o caso do PROAMBIENTE
M. Muro, P. Jeffrey (2008)
A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processesJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51
Frédérique Jankowski (2013)
Les typologies traditionnelles sont-elles fonctionnelles ?Revue D'anthropologie Des Connaissances
S. Jose (2009)
Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overviewAgroforestry Systems, 76
C. Butler, R. Chambers, K. Chopra, P. Dasgupta, A. Duraiappah, Pushpam Kumar, A. McMichael, J. Wells (2003)
Ecosystems and Human well-being
C. Viana, E. Coudel, J. Barlow, J. Ferreira, T. Gardner, Luke Parry (2016)
How Does Hybrid Governance Emerge? Role of the elite in building a Green Municipality in the Eastern Brazilian AmazonEnvironmental Policy and Governance, 26
Seline Meijer, D. Catacutan, O. Ajayi, G. Sileshi, M. Nieuwenhuis (2015)
The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan AfricaInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13
J. Jouan, Mireille Graeuwe, M. Carof, R. Baccar, N. Bareille, S. Bastian, Delphine Brogna, G. Burgio, S. Couvreur, M. Cupiał, B. Dumont, A. Jacquot, Serena Magagnoli, J. Makulska, Kevin Maréchal, G. Pérès, A. Ridier, T. Salou, B. Tombarkiewicz, F. Sgolastra, Olivier Godinot (2020)
Learning Interdisciplinarity and Systems Approaches in Agroecology: Experience with the Serious Game SEGAESustainability
Dendi Muhamad, S. Okubo, K. Harashina, Parikesit, B. Gunawan, K. Takeuchi (2014)
Living close to forests enhances people׳s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, IndonesiaEcosystem services, 8
Anaïs Tibi, O. Thérond (2018)
Services écosystémiques fournis par les espaces agricoles
C. Barnaud, E. Corbera, R. Muradian, Nicolas Salliou, Clélia Sirami, A. Vialatte, J. Choisis, N. Dendoncker, R. Mathevet, Clémence Moreau, V. Reyes‐García, Martí Boada, M. Deconchat, C. Cibien, S. Garnier, R. Maneja, M. Antona (2018)
Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual frameworkEcology and Society, 23
(2009)
In: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE)
J. Boyd, H. Banzhaf (2006)
What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting UnitsEnvironmental Economics
François Bousquet, O. Barreteau, P. D'Aquino, M. Etienne, S. Boissau, S. Aubert, C. Page, D. Babin, J. Castella, M. Janssen (2002)
Multi-agent systems and role games : collective learning processes for ecosystem management
M. Griffon (2009)
Qu'est-ce que l'agriculture écologiquement intensive et à haute valeur environnementale ?, 202
J Boyd, S Banzhaf (2007)
What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting unitsEcol Econ, 63
R. Haines-Young, M. Potschin (2010)
Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
M. Duru, O. Thérond, G. Martin, R. Martin-Clouaire, M. Magne, E. Justes, E. Journet, J. Aubertot, S. Savary, J. Bergez, J. Sarthou (2015)
How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a reviewAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 35
J. Börner, A. Mendoza, S. Vosti (2007)
Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptionsEcological Economics, 64
S. Lele, O. Springate-Baginski, Roan Lakerveld, Debal Deb, P. Dash (2013)
Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and AlternativesConservation and Society, 11
M. Piketty, R. Poccard-Chapuis, I. Drigo, E. Coudel, Sophie Plassin, F. Laurent, M. Thalês (2015)
Multi-level Governance of Land Use Changes in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons from Paragominas, State of ParáForests, 6
S. Assefa, Aad Kessler, L. Fleskens (2021)
Exploring decision-making in campaign-based watershed management by using a role-playing game in Boset District, EthiopiaAgricultural Systems, 190
F. Rives, D. Pesche, Philippe Méral, S. Carrière (2016)
Les services écosystémiques : une notion discutée en écologie
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
This research assessed how ecosystem services (ES) are taken into account in the decision-making process of stakeholders involved in the management of agroecosystems, in particular agroforestry systems, and how an Role-Playing Game (RPG) can serve as a tool to allow them to discuss the issues concerned. The study was conducted in two municipalities (Paragominas and Irituia) located in the Brazilian Amazon. The game was developed in 2018 using a co-construction process that mainly included farmers, students and researchers. Data was collected during two sessions of the game held in 2019, with participation by heterogeneous participants from different local institutions. Our results demonstrated that game sessions showed how the provision of ES, as well as other factors (e.g. values, availability of factors), is taken into account in planning the spatio-temporal configuration of the agroecosystem and associated agricultural practices. They also revealed some trade-offs involved in this decision-making process. We conclude that the RPG allowed stakeholders to synthesize and discuss different types of knowledge about this process. Bringing these elements to the discussion can contribute to an improved shared understanding of the challenges and possibilities of the ecological management of agroecosystems and can indicate solutions that are in line with local expectations.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Agroecology; Farming management; Cropping systems; Serious game; Knowledge sharing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.