Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. L. Pollock (1987)
Defeasible reasoningCognitive Science, 11
C. Reed, D. Walton (2001)
Applications of Argumentation Schemes
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
Bart Verheij (2003)
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: towards a methodology for the investigation of argumentation schemes
A. Soeteman (1989)
Logic in Law
J. Hage (1996)
Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic
H. Prakken (1997)
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
H. Prakken (1997)
A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
Bart Verheij (2000)
Henry Prakken (1997). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in LawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 8
J. Hage (2001)
Legal Logic Its Existence, Nature and Use
H. Prakken (1997)
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument
(1963)
A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation
Bart Verheij (2003)
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified AssumptionsJ. Log. Comput., 13
Bart Verheij (2001)
Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes
(1996)
Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
Bart Verheij (2003)
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentationArtif. Intell., 150
Douglas Walton (1998)
Ad Hominem Arguments
Bart Verheij, J. Hage (2000)
Logic, Context and Valid Inference Or: Can there be a Logic of Law?
Bart Verheij (1999)
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
J. Pollock (1995)
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (2004)
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
Manfred Kienpointner (1992)
Alltagslogik : Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern
J. C. Hage (2001)
Pluralism and Law
R. Reiter (1987)
A Logic for Default ReasoningArtif. Intell., 13
H. Prakken (2000)
Book review: Formalism and interpretation in the logic of law
J. Benthem, J. Groenendijk, D. Jongh, M. Stokhof, H. Verkuyl (1991)
Logic, language and meaning: Vol. I: Introduction to logic
J. Hage (1997)
Reasoning with Rules
B. Verheij (1999)
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
J. Pollock (2008)
Reasoning: Defeasible Reasoning
R. Girle, D. Hitchcock, P. McBurney, Bart Verheij (2004)
Argumentation Machines, New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, 9
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Henkemans, J. Blair, Ralph Johnson, E. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D. Walton, C. Willard, J. Woods, D. Zarefsky (1996)
Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory
L. Gamut (1991)
Logic, language, and meaning
S. Toulmin (1960)
The uses of argument
Trevor Bench-Capon, G. Sartor (2003)
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and valuesArtif. Intell., 150
R. Summers (1963)
LOGIC IN THE LAWMind
J. Hage (1993)
Monological reason-based logic: a low level integration of rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning
(2001)
Book review of D. Walton's 'The New Dialectic', 'Ad Hominem Arguments' and 'One-Sided Arguments
(1996)
Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat
A. Borgers, Irving Copi (1962)
Introduction to LogicJournal of Symbolic Logic, 35
H. Herik, M. Moens, J. Bing, B. Buggenhout, John Zeleznikow, C. Grutters (1999)
Legal Knowledge Based Systems
Ch. Perelman, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, J. Wilkinson, P. Weaver (1971)
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
J. C. Hage (1997)
An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic
A. Roth (2003)
Case-based reasoning in the law : a formal theory of reasoning by case comparison
E. Krabbe (2004)
Argumentation and its Applications
H. Prakken, C. Reed, D. Walton (2003)
Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence
F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, F. Snoeck Henkemans (1996)
A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Henkemans, J. Blair, Ralph Johnson, E. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D. Walton, C. Willard, J. Woods, D. Zarefsky (1997)
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary DevelopmentsCollege Composition and Communication, 48
F. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Henkemans (1997)
Handboek van de argumentatietheorie. Historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen [Vertaling van: 'Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mawhaw N.J.]
This paper describes an approach to legal logic based on the formal analysis of argumentation schemes. Argumentation schemes a notion borrowed from the .eld of argumentation theory - are a kind of generalized rules of inference, in the sense that they express that given certain premises a particular conclusion can be drawn. However, argumentation schemes need not concern strict, abstract, necessarily valid patterns of reasoning, but can be defeasible, concrete and contingently valid, i.e., valid in certain contexts or under certain circumstances. A method is presented to analyze argumentation schemes and it is shown how argumentation schemes can be embedded in a formal model of dialectical argumentation.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 7, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.