Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Weiser (2009)
The Future of Internet Regulation
Abraham Newman, D. Bach (2004)
Self‐Regulatory Trajectories in the Shadow of Public Power: Resolving Digital Dilemmas in Europe and the United StatesGovernance, 17
L. Sweeney (2002)
k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting PrivacyInt. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., 10
J. Minari, Tetsuya Shirai, Kazuto Kato (2014)
Ethical considerations of research policy for personal genome analysis: the approach of the Genome Science Project in JapanLife Sciences, Society and Policy, 10
E Hüpkes (2009)
Regulation, self-regulation or co-regulation?Journal of Business Law, 5
G. Stirrat, R. Gill (2005)
Autonomy in medical ethics after O’NeillJournal of Medical Ethics, 31
Markus Jachtenfuchs (2006)
The Transformation of Governance in the European Union *
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 2017. Ethics guidelines for human genome/gene analysis research
S. Rose (2014)
Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making
EJ Balleisen, M Eisner (2009)
New perspectives on regulation
Lemai Nguyen, P. Swatman (2000)
Essential and incidental complexity in requirements modelsProceedings Fourth International Conference on Requirements Engineering. ICRE 2000. (Cat. No.98TB100219)
T. Manolio, M. Abramowicz, F. Al-Mulla, W. Anderson, R. Balling, A. Berger, S. Bleyl, A. Chakravarti, W. Chantratita, R. Chisholm, Vajira Dissanayake, Michael Dunn, V. Dzau, B. Han, Tim Hubbard, Anne Kolbé, B. Korf, M. Kubo, P. Lasko, Erkki Leego, S. Mahasirimongkol, Partha Majumdar, G. Matthijs, H. McLeod, A. Metspalu, P. Meulien, S. Miyano, Y. Naparstek, P. O’Rourke, G. Patrinos, H. Rehm, M. Relling, G. Rennert, L. Rodriguez, D. Roden, A. Shuldiner, S. Sinha, P. Tan, Mats Ulfendahl, R. Ward, Marc Williams, John Wong, E. Green, G. Ginsburg (2015)
Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not aloneScience Translational Medicine, 7
N. Kato, F. Takeuchi, Y. Tabara, T. Kelly, M. Go, X. Sim, W. Tay, Chien-Hsiun Chen, Yi Zhang, Ken Yamamoto, T. Katsuya, M. Yokota, Young-Jin Kim, R. Ong, T. Nabika, D. Gu, Li-Ching Chang, Y. Kokubo, Wei Huang, K. Ohnaka, Y. Yamori, E. Nakashima, C. Jaquish, Jong-Young Lee, Mark Seielstad, M. Isono, J. Hixson, Yuan-Tsong Chen, T. Miki, Xueya Zhou, T. Sugiyama, Jae-Pil Jeon, Jianjun Liu, R. Takayanagi, Sung Kim, T. Aung, Y. Sung, Xuegong Zhang, T. Wong, B. Han, Shotai Kobayashi, T. Ogihara, Dingliang Zhu, N. Iwai, Jer-Yuarn Wu, Y. Teo, E. Tai, Y. Cho, Jiang He (2011)
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants associated with blood pressure variation in east AsiansNature Genetics, 43
(2004)
Ethics guidelines for human genome/gene analysis research (2nd edition)Journal of the Kyorin Medical Society, 36
(2002)
Technical Review Working Group report: Consideration of BQuasi-Personal Information (Tentative Title)^and BData with Reduced Personal Identification (Tentative Title)^from the technical point of view
Hiroyuki Nagai, Yoshio Nukaga, Koji Saeki, A. Akabayashi (2009)
Self-regulation of recombinant DNA technology in Japan in the 1970s.Historia scientiarum : international journal of the History of Science Society of Japan, 19 1
Edward Balleisen, M. Eisner (2009)
The Promise and Pitfalls of Co-Regulation : How Governments Can Draw on Private Governance for Public Purpose
(2010)
The prospects for effective co-regulation in the United States: A historian’s view from the early twenty-first century
(1995)
Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
Jennifer Ferreira (2017)
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO)
I. Brown, C. Marsden (2013)
Regulating Code - Good Governance and Better Regulation in the Information Age
RC Fox, JP Swazey (2008)
Observing bioethics
PJ Weiser (2010)
Towards an international dialogue on the institutional side of antitrustNYU Annual Survey of American Law, 66
(2000)
Policy outline regarding the basic legislation for the protection of personal information
Jeffrey Baker (1999)
The Birth of BioethicsPediatrics, 104
EJ Balleisen (2010)
Government and markets: Toward a new theory of regulation
J. Pierre (2000)
Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy
(2001)
The 2nd science and technology basic plan
G Christou, S Simpson (2009)
New governance, the internet, and country code top-level domains in EuropeGovernance, 22
Strategic Headquarters for the Promotion of an Advanced Information and Telecommunications Network Society (IT Strategic Headquarters). 2013b. Overview of the 2nd proceedings
M. Gillen (2012)
Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in CyberspaceInt. J. Law Inf. Technol., 20
D. Black (2002)
Autonomy and Trust in BioethicsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 95
A. Akabayashi (2011)
Bioethics in Japan, 1980-2009: Importation, Development, and the FutureAsian Bioethics Review, 1
P. Weiser (2010)
Towards an International Dialogue on the Institutional Side of AntitrustInternational Economic Law eJournal
L. Senden (2006)
Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet?
N. Kato (2013)
Insights into the genetic basis of type 2 diabetesJournal of Diabetes Investigation, 4
(1980)
Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data
Y Hishiyama (2003)
Handbook of bioethics
(2003)
Handbook of bioethics. Tokyo: Tsukiji-Shokan (in Japanese). Hüpkes, Eva
Richard Collins (2009)
Trust and Trustworthiness in the Fourth and Fifth EstatesInternational Journal of Communication, 3
(2008)
Observing bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press. Headquarters for Healthcare Policy
An analysis of the policy, research and historical documents was performed to better understand the regulatory context within which the Japanese government has come to address the social control of human genome research and the measures it has taken, with regard to the handling of personal data, an area where innovations in the life sciences and in information and communication technology overlap. Our study revealed a shift in policy over time from a rigid to a more collaborative approach to regulation. From the 1980s to the 2000s, security control measures were developed to prevent leakage of personal data to external entities, using methods such as anonymisation, which can be applied in a linkable or unlinkable fashion. However, by the 2010s, de-identification measures have been introduced. They make it possible to utilise personal data that is de-identified (not completely, but specific individuals cannot be easily identified) in certain types of genomic research. This also involved the establishment of an independent data protection authority that controls the utilisation of data in collaboration with other stakeholders. Through this process, bioethics policy has become an established science and technology policy in Japan; and in recent years, bioethics policy has also gained relevance in areas outside the life sciences.
Asian Bioethics Review – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 9, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.