Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Nabid, I. Hajirasouliha, David Margarit, M. Petkovski (2020)
Optimum energy based seismic design of friction dampers in RC structuresStructures, 27
Xilin Lu, Ying Zhou, Feng Yan (2008)
Shaking Table Test and Numerical Analysis of RC Frames with Viscous Wall DampersJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 134
(2015)
Robust MultiObjective Optimization Design of Active Tuned Mass Damper System to Mitigate the Vibrations of a High-Rise Building,
Joaquim Tchamo, Ying Zhou (2018)
An alternative practical design method for structures with viscoelastic dampersEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17
P. Zakian, A. Kaveh (2020)
Topology optimization of shear wall structures under seismic loadingEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 19
(2012)
“ A Simplifi ed Optimization Strategy for Nonlinear Tuned Mass Damper in Structural Vibration Control
D. Wolpert, W. Macready (1997)
No free lunch theorems for optimizationIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 1
Y Kanno (2013)
10.1002/eqe.2292Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42
C. Patel, R. Jangid (2014)
Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damperStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 21
(2008)
Dampers for Seismic Upgrading of Multistory Buildings Based on a Cost ‐ Eff ectiveness Criterion Using Genetic Algorithm
KC Chang (1995)
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:10(1418)Journal of Structural Engineering, 121
(2015)
“ Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structure in 3 Dimension , ” Finite Element Program , University Putra Malaysia
R. Fukuda, H. Kurino (2019)
Highly efficient semi‐active oil damper with energy recovery systemJapan Architectural Review
(2015)
Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structure in 3 Dimension,
Shiang‐Jung Wang, I-Chen Chiu, Chung-Han Yu, Kuo-Chun Chang (2018)
Experimental and analytical study on design performance of full-scale viscoelastic dampersEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17
S. Mirjalili, S. Hashim, Hossein Sardroudi (2012)
Training feedforward neural networks using hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithmAppl. Math. Comput., 218
Z. Li, G. Shu (2019)
Optimal placement of metallic dampers for seismic upgrading of multistory buildings based on a cost‐effectiveness criterion using genetic algorithmThe Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28
L. Miguel, L. Miguel, R. Lopez (2014)
Robust design optimization of friction dampers for structural response controlStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 21
Sergio Ontiveros-Pérez, L. Miguel, L. Miguel (2017)
Robust Simultaneous Optimization of Friction Damper for the Passive Vibration Control in a Colombian BuildingProcedia Engineering, 199
(2019)
“ A Modifi ed Monkey Algorithm for Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
K. Chang, T. Soong, S. Oh, M. Lai (1996)
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF STEEL FRAME WITH ADDED VISCOELASTIC DAMPERSJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 121
Navid Razmjooy, M. Ramezani (2016)
Training Wavelet Neural Networks Using Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm for System Identification
(2008)
Particle Swarm Optimization of TMD by Non‐ Stationary Base Excitation During Earthquak,
B. Keshtegar, S. Etedali (2018)
Nonlinear mathematical modeling and optimum design of tuned mass dampers using adaptive dynamic harmony search algorithmStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 25
W. Guo, Hongnan Li, Guo-huan Liu, Zhi-wu Yu (2012)
A Simplified Optimization Strategy for Nonlinear Tuned Mass Damper in Structural Vibration ControlAsian Journal of Control, 14
(2019)
Highly Effi cient Semi ‐ Active Oil Damper with Energy Recovery System
M. Mohebbi, A. Joghataie (2012)
Designing optimal tuned mass dampers for nonlinear frames by distributed genetic algorithmsThe Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, Xu-Dong Zhang (2012)
A modified monkey algorithm for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoringSmart Materials and Structures, 21
M. Abdulhadi, Zhang Xun’an, Buqiao Fan, M. Moman (2021)
Substructure design optimization and nonlinear responses control analysis of the mega-sub controlled structural system (MSCSS) under earthquake actionEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20
M. Pathan, S. Patsias, V. Tagarielli (2018)
A real-coded genetic algorithm for optimizing the damping response of composite laminatesComputers & Structures, 198
T. Yi, Hong‐Nan Li, Ming Gu (2011)
Optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring based on multiple optimization strategiesThe Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20
G. Hart (2005)
The structural design of tall and special buildingsThe Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 14
M. Kargahi, C. Ekwueme (2009)
Structural Optimization of Viscous Dampers Using Genetic Algorithms for Improving Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings
B. Kiani, B. Hashemi, S. Torabian (2020)
Optimization of slit dampers to improve energy dissipation capacity and low-cycle-fatigue performanceEngineering Structures, 214
A. Puthanpurayil, O. Lavan, R. Dhakal (2020)
Multi-objective loss-based optimization of viscous dampers for seismic retrofitting of irregular structuresSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129
A. Fateh, F. Hejazi, M. Jaafar, I. Karim (2016)
Development of a nonlinear conical spring bracing system for framed structures subjected to dynamic loadInternational Journal of Steel Structures, 16
(2010)
A New Hybrid PSO-GSA Algorithm for Function Optimization,
H. Miyamoto, J. Singh (2002)
Performance of Structures with Passive Energy DissipatorsEarthquake Spectra, 18
Hongnan Li, T. Yi, M. Gu, L. Huo (2009)
Evaluation of earthquake-induced structural damages by wavelet transformProgress in Natural Science, 19
B. Andrawes, B. Andrawes, R. DesRoches, R. DesRoches (2007)
Comparison between Shape Memory Alloy Seismic Restrainers and Other Bridge Retrofit DevicesJournal of Bridge Engineering, 12
H. Ghorbani, F. Rofooei (2020)
A novel double slip loads friction damper to control the seismic response of structuresEngineering Structures, 225
(2009)
Structural Optimization of Viscous Dampers Using Genetic Algorithms for Improving Seismic Performance of Existing Building , ” in B . Goodno
H. Jarrahi, A. Asadi, M. Khatibinia, S. Etedali (2020)
Optimal design of rotational friction dampers for improving seismic performance of inelastic structuresJournal of building engineering, 27
L. Casagrande, E. Villa, A. Nespoli, A. Occhiuzzi, A. Bonati, F. Auricchio (2019)
Innovative dampers as floor isolation systems for seismically-retrofit multi-storey critical facilitiesEngineering Structures, 201
Y. Kanno (2012)
MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS Damper Placement Optimization in a Shear Building Model with Discrete Design Variables: A Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming Approach
Amory Martin, G. Deierlein (2020)
Structural topology optimization of tall buildings for dynamic seismic excitation using modal decompositionEngineering Structures, 216
J. Guo, Ali Ashasi-Sorkhabi, O. Mercan, C. Christopoulos (2017)
Real-time hybrid simulation of structures equipped with viscoelastic-plastic dampers using a user-programmable computational platformEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16
T. Yi, Yao Xiaojun, Qu Chunxu, Hongnan Li (2019)
Clustering Number Determination for Sparse Component Analysis during Output-Only Modal IdentificationJournal of Engineering Mechanics
YT Leung, Haijun Zhang, Chor Cheng, YY Lee (2008)
Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non‐stationary base excitation during earthquakeEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37
(2019)
Monkey Algorithm for Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring,
Previous studies about optimizing earthquake structural energy dissipation systems indicated that most existing techniques employ merely one or a few parameters as design variables in the optimization process, and thereby are only applicable only to simple, single, or multiple degree-of-freedom structures. The current approaches to optimization procedures take a specific damper with its properties and observe the effect of applying time history data to the building; however, there are many different dampers and isolators that can be used. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies regarding the optimum location for various viscous and wall dampers. The main aim of this study is hybridization of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) and gravitational search algorithm (GSA) to optimize the performance of earthquake energy dissipation systems (i.e., damper devices) simultaneously with optimizing the characteristics of the structure. Four types of structural dampers device are considered in this study: (i) variable stiffness bracing (VSB) system, (ii) rubber wall damper (RWD), (iii) nonlinear conical spring bracing (NCSB) device, (iv) and multi-action stiffener (MAS) device. Since many parameters may affect the design of seismic resistant structures, this study proposes a hybrid of PSO and GSA to develop a hybrid, multi-objective optimization method to resolve the aforementioned problems. The characteristics of the above-mentioned damper devices as well as the section size for structural beams and columns are considered as variables for development of the PSO-GSA optimization algorithm to minimize structural seismic response in terms of nodal displacement (in three directions) as well as plastic hinge formation in structural members simultaneously with the weight of the structure. After that, the optimization algorithm is implemented to identify the best position of the damper device in the structural frame to have the maximum effect and minimize the seismic structure response. To examine the performance of the proposed PSO-GSA optimization method, it has been applied to a three-story reinforced structure equipped with a seismic damper device. The results revealed that the method successfully optimized the earthquake energy dissipation systems and reduced the effects of earthquakes on structures, which significantly increase the building’s stability and safety during seismic excitation. The analysis results showed a reduction in the seismic response of the structure regarding the formation of plastic hinges in structural members as well as the displacement of each story to approximately 99.63%, 60.5%, 79.13% and 57.42% for the VSB device, RWD, NCSB device, and MAS device, respectively. This shows that using the PSO-GSA optimization algorithm and optimized damper devices in the structure resulted in no structural damage due to earthquake vibration.
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 1, 2022
Keywords: hybrid optimization algorithm; structures; earthquake; seismic damper devices; particle swarm optimization method; gravitational search algorithm
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.