Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sajjad Ahmad, S. Simonovic (2005)
An Artificial Neural Network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parametersJournal of Hydrology, 315
(1998)
An artificial neural network approach to rainfall – runoff modeling
A. Dorum, A. Yarar, M. Sevimli, Mustafa Onüçyildiz (2010)
Modelling the rainfall-runoff data of susurluk basinExpert Syst. Appl., 37
N. Raghuwanshi, Rajendra Singh, L. Reddy (2006)
Runoff and Sediment Yield Modeling using Artificial Neural Networks: Upper Siwane River, IndiaJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11
C. Wu, K. Chau (2011)
Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysisJournal of Hydrology, 399
(2010)
Climate non-stationary validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies
M. Rajurkar, U. Kothyari, U. Chaube (2004)
Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural networkJournal of Hydrology, 285
L. Chua, Tommy Wong, X. Wang (2011)
Information recovery from measured data by linear artificial neural networks - An example from rainfall-runoff modelingAppl. Soft Comput., 11
(2009)
Utilization of artificial neural network (ANN) to modeling the rainfall runoff relationship in a catchment area located in a semiarid region of Iran
In this study, an attempt has been made to develop an ANN model to estimate runoff from a snow covered catchment of eastern Himalaya using feed-forward back-propagation algorithm with Levenberg–Marquardt optimization technique. The ANN model was programmed in C++ whereas a user-friendly GUI was developed in VB. The effects of past days rainfall and present day temperature data was observed on the performance of the selected ANN architecture in modelling snowmelt and monsoon season runoff. For this purpose, 8 years’ (2003–2010) daily data (rainfall, temperature, and discharge) were collected from CWC which were again divided into two parts (2003–2008 and 2009–2010) for training and testing of the ANN model, respectively. Initially it was found that the network can produce acceptable results with only rainfall data as input, but it needs at least past 3 days rainfall data to account for the antecedent moisture condition of the catchment. Networks 4-16-16-1 (with past 3 days rainfall) and 6-18-18-18-1 (with past 5 days rainfall) resulted modelling efficiency of 79.38 and 82.06% in training and 55.13 and 61.06% in validation, respectively. However, addition of present day temperature data as another input improved the performance in both training (ME 83.10 and 82.22%) and testing (ME 62.64 and 61.89%) marginally.
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 14, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.