Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Andrew Marks (2018)
Set theoryMathematical Statistics with Applications in R
Sherwood Hachtman (2017)
CALIBRATING DETERMINACY STRENGTH IN LEVELS OF THE BOREL HIERARCHYThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 82
T Jech (2003)
Set Theory. The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded
A Montalbán, RA Shore (2012)
The limits of determinacy in second-order arithmeticProc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 104
J. Barwise (1976)
Admissible Sets and Structures: An Approach to Definability Theory
(1977)
Determinateness and subsystems of analysis
R Schindler, M Zeman (2010)
Handbook of Set Theory
V Gitman, JD Hamkins (2017)
Foundations of Mathematics
J Barwise (1975)
Admissible Sets and Structures: An Approach to Definability Theory, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic
H. Hermes (1973)
Introduction to mathematical logic
Sherwood Hachtman (2017)
Determinacy in third order arithmeticAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 168
G. Haeffler, U. Ljungblad, I. Kiyan, D. Hanstorp (1997)
Fine structure of As−Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters, 42
R. Jensen (1972)
The fine structure of the constructible hierarchyAnnals of Mathematical Logic, 4
A. Montalbán, R. Shore (2012)
The limits of determinacy in second order arithmetic: consistency and complexity strengthIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 204
N. Schweber (2013)
TRANSFINITE RECURSION IN HIGHER REVERSE MATHEMATICSThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 80
V. Gitman, J. Hamkins (2015)
Open determinacy for class gamesarXiv: Logic
H. Friedman (1971)
Higher set theory and mathematical practiceAnnals of Mathematical Logic, 2
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
We show, assuming weak large cardinals, that in the context of games of length $$\omega $$ ω with moves coming from a proper class, clopen determinacy is strictly weaker than open determinacy. The proof amounts to an analysis of a certain level of L that exists under large cardinal assumptions weaker than an inaccessible. Our argument is sufficiently general to give a family of determinacy separation results applying in any setting where the universal class is sufficiently closed; e.g., in third, seventh, or $$(\omega +2)$$ ( ω + 2 ) th order arithmetic. We also prove bounds on the strength of Borel determinacy for proper class games. These results answer questions of Gitman and Hamkins.
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 2, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.