Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Grisso (2012)
Juveniles’ Waiver of Rights: Legal and Psychological Competence
R. Rogers, Kimberly Harrison, L. Hazelwood, K. Sewell (2007)
Knowing and Intelligent: A Study of Miranda Warnings in Mentally Disordered DefendantsLaw and Human Behavior, 31
R. Rogers, Kimberly Harrison, Jill Rogstad, Kathryn Lafortune, L. Hazelwood (2010)
The Role of Suggestibility in Determinations of Miranda Abilities: A Study of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility ScalesLaw and Human Behavior, 34
R. Rogers (2008)
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing...emerging Miranda research and professional roles for psychologists.The American psychologist, 63 8
K. Deffenbacher, Brian Bornstein, Steven Penrod, E. McGorty (2004)
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of High Stress on Eyewitness MemoryLaw and Human Behavior, 28
Lori Colwell, K. Cruise, Laura Guy, W. McCoy, Krissie Fernandez, Heather Ross (2005)
The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders' comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33 4
R. Rogers, Kimberly Harrison, D. Shuman, K. Sewell, L. Hazelwood (2007)
An Analysis of Miranda Warnings and Waivers: Comprehension and CoverageLaw and Human Behavior, 31
G. Miller (1956)
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological review, 63 2
S. Kassin, Rebecca Norwick (2004)
Why People Waive Their Miranda Rights: The Power of InnocenceLaw and Human Behavior, 28
C. Spielberger (2012)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults
S. Holm (1979)
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test ProcedureScandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6
R. Rogers, L. Hazelwood, K. Sewell, D. Shuman, Hayley Blackwood (2008)
The comprehensibility and content of juvenile Miranda warnings.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 14
C. Morgan, G. Hazlett, Anthony Doran, S. Garrett, G. Hoyt, P. Thomas, M. Baranoski, S. Southwick (2004)
Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress.International journal of law and psychiatry, 27 3
D. Smith (2001)
CHAPTER 6 – Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
R. Rogers, L. Hazelwood, K. Sewell, Kimberly Harrison, D. Shuman (2008)
The Language of Miranda Warnings in American Jurisdictions: A Replication and Vocabulary AnalysisLaw and Human Behavior, 32
Melissa Russano, C. Meissner, Fadia Narchet, S. Kassin (2005)
Investigating True and False Confessions Within a Novel Experimental ParadigmPsychological Science, 16
R Rogers, DW Shuman, EY Drogin (2008)
Miranda rights … and wrongs: Myths, methods, and model solutionsCriminal Justice, 23
(2001)
Wechsler individual achievement test
R. Rogers, Jill Rogstad, Jennifer Steadham, E. Drogin (2011)
In plain English: Avoiding recognized problems with Miranda miscomprehension.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17
R. Rogers, L. Hazelwood, K. Sewell, Hayley Blackwood, Jill Rogstad, Kimberly Harrison (2009)
Development and Initial Validation of the Miranda Vocabulary ScaleLaw and Human Behavior, 33
S. Kassin, K. Kiechel (1996)
The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and ConfabulationPsychological Science, 7
R. Rogers, Jill Rogstad, Nathan Gillard, E. Drogin, Hayley Blackwood, D. Shuman (2010)
“Everyone knows their Miranda rights”: Implicit assumptions and countervailing evidence.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16
Programmatic research has made important advances during the last decade in understanding how cognitive and psychological variables affect Miranda comprehension and reasoning. However, the effects of situational stressors are largely overlooked in determining the validity of Miranda waivers. As the first systematic investigation, this study uses a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design on 123 undergraduate participants to examine the effects of being apprehended via a mock crime (i.e., stealing a watch from a Plexiglas case) paradigm on Miranda comprehension and reasoning. Besides the mock-crime condition, the mode of advisement (oral or written) and the length of the warning (124 vs. 228 words) were also investigated. When compared to controls, the mock-crime scenario produced moderate to large effects (ds from .58 to .75) on both Miranda recall and subsequent reasoning. In addition, oral advisements resulted in non-significant trend for decrements in Miranda recall. No main effects were observed for length and no significant interactions were found. Interestingly, specific components (e.g., right to counsel and free legal services) were generally more affected than the more familiar first two components (i.e., right to silence and evidence against you). Within the crime-scenario condition, participants with substantially increased state anxiety predictably performed more poorly than those participants whose state anxiety remained relatively stable. Directions for future research and the implications of these findings on our understanding of Miranda abilities are discussed.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 17, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.