Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Nie, Jim Xu, C. Costantino, V. Thomas (2007)
Overview of Development of P-Cares: Probabilistic Computer Analysis for Rapid Evaluation of Structures.
S. Kramer, R. Mitchell (2006)
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Liquefaction Hazard EvaluationEarthquake Spectra, 22
PNAE G- (1989)
Нормы расчета на прочност оборудования и трубопроводов атомных энергетических установок, ПНАЭ Г-7-002-86
citation_title=Earthquake preparedness and response for nuclear power plants, citation_publication_date= (2011)
Earthquake preparedness and response for nuclear power plants
J. Hancock, J. Bommer (2002)
PREDICTING THE NUMBER OF CYCLES OF GROUND MOTION
KTA (1992)
Auslegung von Kernkraftwerken gegen seismische Einwirkungen
Nukleáris Biztonsági Szabályzatok (2012)
Nukleáris Biztonsági Szabályzatok (2012) 3. kötet, Atomerőművek tervezési követelményei, 37/2012. (III. 9.) Korm. rendelet, Magyar Közlöny. évi 28. szám 2. melléklet a 37/2012. (III. 9.) Korm. rendelethez
耳野 亨 (1970)
ASME boiler and pressure vessel codeの許容応力の改訂
ASME/ANS RA-S- (2008)
ASME/ANS RA-S-2008 (2008) Standard for level 1/large early release frequency probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications
(1986)
Recommendations to the nuclear regulatory commission on trial guidelines for seismic margin reviews of nuclear power plants
EPRI (1988)
) Criterion for determining accidence of the operating basis earthquake
Ma Q Ye L (2011)
Numerical and comparative study of earthquake intensity indices in seismic analysis: the structural design of tall and special buildings
(2007)
Fracture prediction of piping using energy balance method
Xu J Nie J (2006)
P-CARES: probabilistic computer analysis for rapid evaluation of structures
K Kobayashi (2010)
Damage indicating parameters and damage modes of mechanical components
Virginia Electric and Power Company (2011)
North Anna power station units 1 and 2, North Anna independent spent fuel storage installation—summary report of August 23
L. Ye, Q. Ma, Zhiwei Miao, H. Guan, Y. Zhuge (2013)
Numerical and comparative study of earthquake intensity indices in seismic analysisThe Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22
J. Hancock, J. Bommer (2005)
The effective number of cycles of earthquake ground motionEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34
M. Wallace, D. Wagg, S. Neild (2004)
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
T. Katona (2012)
Modeling of fatigue-type seismic damage for nuclear power plantsComputational Materials Science, 64
K. Everhart, R. Stevens, N. Babbitt, P. Clemens, L. Stout (1994)
System Engineering "Toolbox" for Design-Oriented Engineers, 95
EPRI (1988)
) A methodology for assessment of nuclear power plant seismic margin
(2011)
North Anna power station restart readiness
R. Budnitz, P. Amico, C. Cornell, W. Hall, R. Kennedy, J. Reed, M. Shinozuka (1985)
An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants: The importance of BWR plant systems and functions to seismic margins
KTA (1996)
Komponenten des Primärkreises von Leichtwasserreaktoren
G. Panza, R. Cazzaro, F. Vaccari (1997)
Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion parametersAnnals of Geophysics, 40
T. Katona (2010)
Options for the treatment of uncertainty in seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plantsPollack Periodica, 5
T. Katona (2011)
Interpretation of the physical meaning of the cumulative absolute velocityPollack Periodica, 6
M. Kostov (2006)
SITE SPECIFIC ESTIMATION OF CUMULATIVE ABSOLUTE VELOCITY
L. Cabañas, B. Benito, M. Herraiz (1997)
AN APPROACH TO THE MEASUREMENT OF THE POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONSEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26
T. O'Hara, J. Jacobson (1991)
Standardization of the cumulative absolute velocity
Qu Zhe, Ye Lie-ping (2011)
STRENGTH DETERIORATION MODEL BASED ON EFFECTIVE HYSTERETIC ENERGY DISSIPATION FOR RC MEMBERS UNDER CYCLIC LOADINGEngineering mechanics, 28
S. Kramer, S. Upsall (2006)
Instrumental Intensity Scales for Geohazards
Budnitz RJ (1985)
An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants
ASME (2010)
ASME boiler and pressure vessel code (BPVC), Section III: Rules for construction of nuclear power plant components, Division 1, Subsection NB: Class 1 components
Abstract After an earthquake, the condition of industrial systems, structures and equipment, especially at nuclear power plants has to be assessed since this information is needed for accident management and for the decision on the continuation of the operation. The damaging potential of the earthquake can be characterized by maximum horizontal acceleration of the ground motion, response spectra, cumulative absolute velocity and different instrumental intensity values. These quantities can be correlated with the earthquake characteristics, magnitude, distance, etc. Some of the indices are selective to damage mechanism and can be correlated to load-bearing features of the structures. Different indicators of damaging potential of earthquakes are analyzed in the paper from the point of view of applicability for post-event condition assessment at nuclear power plants and for using as criteria for restart of the operation.
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2013
Keywords: geophysics/geodesy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.