Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Beame (1992)
200
M. Ajtai (1990)
Feasible Mathematics
R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi, A. Urquhart (1994)
Proceedings of 9th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
P. Beame (1995)
303
M. Ajtai (1990)
Parity and the Pigeonhole Principle
P. Clote (1992)
Cutting planes and constant depth Frege proofs[1992] Proceedings of the Seventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
S. Cook, R. Reckhow (1979)
The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof SystemsLogic, Automata, and Computational Complexity
Armin Haken (1985)
The Intractability of ResolutionTheor. Comput. Sci., 39
A. Goerdt (1990)
Cuting Plane Versus Frege Proof Systems
J.B. Paris, A.J. Wilkie (1983)
Methods in Mathematical Logic
J. Paris, A. Wilkie (1985)
Counting problems in bounded arithmetic
J. Krajíček (1994)
Feasible Mathematics, vol. II
P. Beame, S. Cook, J. Edmonds, R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi (1995)
The relative complexity of NP search problemsJ. Comput. Syst. Sci., 57
M. Ajtai, Ronald Fagin (1988)
Reachability is harder for directed than for undirected finite graphs[Proceedings 1988] 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
meaning t is not red. 3. 9j n(j 6 = s ^ P(s; j)), meaning at least one edge incident to s
Q(s), meaning s is red
A. Urquhart (1987)
Hard examples for resolutionJ. Assoc. Comput. Machinery, 34
E. T. (1946)
An Introduction to the Theory of NumbersNature, 157
Alan Friese (1992)
Combinatorial OptimizationJournal of the Operational Research Society, 31
W. Cook, W. Cunningham, W. Pulleyblank, A. Schrijver (1997)
Combinatorial optimization
S.A. Cook, R. Reckhow (1977)
On the relative efficiency of propositional proof systemsJ. Symb. Logic, 44
P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, J. Krajíček, T. Pitassi, P. Pudlák, A. Woods (1992)
Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi, A. Urquhart (1994)
Upper and lower bounds for tree-like cutting planes proofsProceedings Ninth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
(1994)
On Frege and extended Frege systems
S. Buss, György Turán (1988)
Resolution Proofs of Generalized Pigeonhole PrinciplesTheor. Comput. Sci., 62
A. Goerdt (1992)
Computer Science Logic 1990, vol. 552
A. Urquhart (1987)
Hard examples for resolutionJ. ACM, 34
S. Buss (1987)
916J. Symb. Logic, 52
W. Cook, Collette Coullard, György Turán (1987)
On the complexity of cutting-plane proofsDiscret. Appl. Math., 18
P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, Jan Krajícek, T. Pitassi, P. Pudlák, Alan Woods (1992)
Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle
(1987)
The propositional pigeonhole principle has polynomial size Frege proofs
P. Clote, J. Krajícek (1993)
Arithmetic, proof theory, and computational complexity
P. Clote (1995)
Cutting plane and Frege proofsInf. Comput., 121
C. Papadimitriou (1994)
On the Complexity of the Parity Argument and Other Inefficient Proofs of ExistenceJ. Comput. Syst. Sci., 48
Originating from work in operations research the cutting plane refutation systemCP is an extension of resolution, where unsatisfiable propositional logic formulas in conjunctive normal form are recognized by showing the non-existence of boolean solutions to associated families of linear inequalities. Polynomial sizeCP proofs are given for the undirecteds-t connectivity principle. The subsystemsCP q ofCP, forq≥2, are shown to be polynomially equivalent toCP, thus answering problem 19 from the list of open problems of [8]. We present a normal form theorem forCP 2-proofs and thereby for arbitraryCP-proofs. As a corollary, we show that the coefficients and constant terms in arbitrary cutting plane proofs may be exponentially bounded by the number of steps in the proof, at the cost of an at most polynomial increase in the number of steps in the proof. The extensionCPLE +, introduced in [9] and there shown top-simulate Frege systems, is proved to be polynomially equivalent to Frege systems. Lastly, since linear inequalities are related to threshold gates, we introduce a new threshold logic and prove a completeness theorem.
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: May 25, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.