Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J Pelfrene, J Kuntsche, S Dam, W Paepegem, J Schneider (2016)
Critical assessment of the post-breakage performance of blast loaded laminated glazing experiments and simulationsInt. J. Impact Eng., 88
X Zhang, H Hao, G Ma (2013)
Parametric study of laminated glass window response to blast loadsEng. Struct., 56
(2014)
Single Degree of Freedom Blast Effects Design Spreadsheet for Windows Version 1.0 (SBEDS-W)
R Deng, X Jin (2010)
Numerical simulation for blast analysis of insulating glass in a curtain wallInt. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech., 11
WL Beason, JR Morgan (1984)
Glass failure prediction modelJ. Struct. Eng., 110
TW Thomson, DM Dahleh (1997)
Theory of Vibration with Applications
CVG Vallabhan, BY-T Wang (1981)
Nonlinear Analysis of Rectangular Glass Plates by Finite Difference Method
GR Cowper, PS Symonds (1958)
Strain Hardening and Strain Rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beams, Applied Mathematics Report
(2012)
ASTM E1300 Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings
This paper presents comparisons of analysis predictions and shock tube test results from a recent dynamic test program involving a conventional Enclos curtain wall system designed solely for wind and gravity loads. Measured blast wave induced glazing response and mullion deflections are compared to response predictions made using fast running nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) techniques incorporating LS-DYNA based finite element analysis of structural mullions and FEA implementation of statistical glass fracture prediction techniques. The design-level nonlinear finite element analysis was performed using WhAM [window (hazard) analysis module], a fast-running, web-based design tool for blast-loaded curtain wall systems. WhAM was developed by Protection Engineering Consultants (PEC) with support from the Enclos Advanced Technology Studio. Post-test comparisons between measured and predicted system and component-level response were carried out to (a) evaluate the accuracy of WhAM, and (b) illustrate how the precision test data can be used to enhance certain features of the WhAM software such as its glass material model (an LS-DYNA user-defined constitutive model with probabilistic failure criterion based on the ASTM E1300 glass failure prediction model and dynamic test data) and simplified modeling techniques for connection details. Note that SI units are used throughout the text of this paper. American/imperial units are also provided in tables when raw data was originally recorded in those units. Data plots resulting from raw data are also presented in American/imperial units.
Glass Structures & Engineering – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 14, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.