Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B.R. Frieden (2004)
Science from Fisher Information: A Unification
C. Shalizi, J. Crutchfield (1999)
Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and SimplicityJournal of Statistical Physics, 104
Jaegwon Kim, E. Sosa (1993)
Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical EssaysPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56
W. Alston, Fred Dretske (1985)
Knowledge and the Flow of Information
Agustín Vicente, J. Ezquerro (1996)
Supervenience and MindTheoria-revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia, 11
P. Glansdorff, I. Prigogine (1971)
Thermodynamic theory of structure, stability and fluctuations
D. Chalmers (2000)
What is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness
R. Wallace (2005)
A modular network treatment of Baars' Global Workspace consciousness model
D. Chalmers (2000)
Neural Correlates of Consciousness
W. Miranker (2005)
The Hebbian synapse: Progenitor of consciousnessMind and Matter, 3
H. Haken (1983)
Synergetics: An Introduction
H. Primas (1998)
Emergence in exact natural science
B. Frieden (2004)
Science from Fisher Information
S. Hagan, S. Hameroff, J. Tuszynski (2000)
Quantum computation in brain microtubules: decoherence and biological feasibility.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 65 6 Pt 1
B. Baars (1988)
A cognitive theory of consciousness
Max Tegmark (1999)
The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processesPhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 61 4 Pt B
BOOK REVIEW TOWARD AN INFORMATION THEORETICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTEXTUAL CONDITIONS FOR CONSCIOUSNESS Wallace, R. (2005). Consciousness: A Mathematical Treatment of the Global Neuronal Workspace Model. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 0-387-25242-8, Euro 46.95; hbk. A major driving force behind the attention that cognitive neuroscience has received in recent decades is the deep mystery of how consciousness is related to brain activity. Many scientists have been fascinated by the wealth of empirical data for individual neurons, neural assemblies, brain areas, and related psychological and behavioral features, and by progressively powerful computational tools to simulate corresponding cortical networks. At the same time, the interested public has been attracted by fancy illustrations of brain activity (e.g., from imaging techniques) and by pretentious claims of neural solutions to basic philosophical problems (e.g., free will versus determinism) in popular magazines and newspapers. However, heaps of data, extensive simulations, pretty pictures and bold statements cannot replace the insight that is inevitable to relate the available facts to one another in an intelligible manner. I am talking about the old-fashioned stance that understanding is the ultimate goal of scientific effort. In this respect, the need for new conceptual and theoretical ideas in cognitive neuroscience begins to be recognized
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.