Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Schneidman-Duhovny, Y. Inbar, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2005)
Geometry‐based flexible and symmetric protein dockingProteins: Structure, 60
C. Oostenbrink, A. Villa, A. Mark, W. Gunsteren (2004)
A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25
M. Eisenstein, E. Katchalski‐Katzir (2004)
On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking.Comptes rendus biologies, 327 5
J. Cherfils, S. Duquerroy, J. Janin (1991)
Protein‐protein recognition analyzed by docking simulationProteins: Structure, 11
H. Senn, W. Thiel (2007)
QM/MM studies of enzymes.Current opinion in chemical biology, 11 2
Z. Weng, S. Vajda, C. DeLisi (1996)
Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functionsProtein Science, 5
Niu Huang, M. Jacobson (2007)
Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions.Current opinion in drug discovery & development, 10 3
M. Machius, Lázsló Vértesy, R. Huber, G. Wiegand (1996)
Carbohydrate and protein-based inhibitors of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase: structure analysis and comparison of their binding characteristics.Journal of molecular biology, 260 3
M. Totrov, R. Abagyan (1994)
Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme–antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracyNature Structural Biology, 1
C. Camacho, D. Gatchell, S. Kimura, S. Vajda (2000)
Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid‐body protein‐protein dockingProteins: Structure, 40
G. Warren, C. Andrews, A. Capelli, Brian Clarke, Judith LaLonde, M. Lambert, M. Lindvall, Neysa Nevins, S. Semus, S. Senger, G. Tedesco, Ian Wall, James Woolven, C. Peishoff, M. Head (2006)
A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.Journal of medicinal chemistry, 49 20
D. Schneidman-Duhovny, Y. Inbar, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2005)
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric dockingNucleic Acids Research, 33
Efrat Mashiach, D. Schneidman-Duhovny, Nelly Andrusier, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2008)
FireDock: a web server for fast interaction refinement in molecular docking†Nucleic Acids Research, 36
D. Schneidman-Duhovny, Y. Inbar, Vladimír Polák, Maxim Shatsky, Inbal Halperin, H. Benyamini, Adi Barzilai, Oranit Dror, Nurit Haspel, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2003)
Taking geometry to its edge: Fast unbound rigid (and hinge‐bent) dockingProteins: Structure, 52
Y. Inbar, D. Schneidman-Duhovny, Inbal Halperin, A. Oron, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2005)
Approaching the CAPRI challenge with an efficient geometry‐based dockingProteins: Structure, 60
B. Shoichet, I. Kuntz (1991)
Protein docking and complementarity.Journal of molecular biology, 221 1
Nelly Andrusier, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson (2007)
FireDock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular dockingProteins: Structure, 69
The prediction of protein–protein interactions based on independently obtained structural information for each interacting partner remains an important challenge in computational chemistry. Procedures where hypothetical interaction models (or decoys) are generated, then ranked using a biochemically relevant scoring function have been garnering interest as an avenue for addressing such challenges. The program PatchDock has been shown to produce reasonable decoys for modeling the association between pig alpha-amylase and the VH-domains of camelide antibody raised against it. We designed a biochemically relevant method by which PatchDock decoys could be ranked in order to separate near-native structures from false positives. Several thousand steps of energy minimization were used to simulate induced fit within the otherwise rigid decoys and to rank them. We applied a partial free energy function to rank each of the binding modes, improving discrimination between near-native structures and false positives. Sorting decoys according to strain energy increased the proportion of near-native decoys near the bottom of the ranked list. Additionally, we propose a novel method which utilizes regression analysis for the selection of minimization convergence criteria and provides approximation of the partial free energy function as the number of algorithmic steps approaches infinity.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 23, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.