Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Appleby, P. Sandøe (2002)
Philosophical Debate on the Nature of Well-Being: Implications for Animal WelfareAnimal Welfare
D. Fraser (1993)
Assessing Animal Well-Being: Common Sense, Uncommon Science
D Fraser, DM Weary (2004)
The well-being of farm animals. Challenges and solutions
D. Fraser, D. Weary (2008)
Quality of Life for Farm Animals: Linking Science, Ethics, and Animal Welfare
W. Russell, R. Burch (1960)
The Principles of Humane Experimental TechniqueMedical Journal of Australia, 1
I. Duncan (2008)
A Concept of Welfare Based on Feelings
P. Sandøe, S. Christiansen, M. Appleby (2003)
Farm Animal Welfare: The Interaction of Ethical Questions and Animal Welfare ScienceAnimal Welfare
R. Ryder (1998)
The Political Animal: The Conquest of Speciesism
I. Duncan (1981)
Animal Rights – Animal Welfare: A Scientist’s AssessmentPoultry Science, 60
S. Kagan (1992)
The Limits of Well-BeingSocial Philosophy and Policy, 9
M Kheel (2004)
Food for thought. The debate over eating meat
J. Jasper, D. Nelkin (1991)
The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest
D. Fraser, D. Weary, E. Pajor, B. Milligan (1997)
A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical ConcernsAnimal Welfare
D. Fraser (2008)
Understanding animal welfareActa Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50
M. Appleby (1999)
What Should We Do About Animal Welfare
Bruce Brower, L. Sumner (1998)
Welfare, happiness, and ethics
D Fraser, LR Matthews (1997)
Animal welfare
R Harrison (1964)
Animal machines
M. Appleby, J. Mench, B. Hughes (2004)
Poultry Behaviour and Welfare
G. Benson, B. Rollin (2004)
The Well-Being of Farm Animals
S. Sapontzis (1987)
Morals, reason, and animals
Sapontzis (2012)
The Debate Over Eating Meat, 2
J. Mench (1998)
Thirty years after Brambell: whither animal welfare science?Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS, 1 2
D. DeGrazia (1996)
Taking Animals Seriously-Mental life and moral status
R. Haynes (2008)
Animal Welfare: Competing Conceptions And Their Ethical Implications
E. Paul, F. Miller, J. Paul (1992)
The good life and the human good
Animal welfare has been conceptualized in such a way that the use of animals in science and for food seems justified. I argue that those who have done this have appropriated the concept of animal welfare, claiming to give a scientific account that is more objective than the “sentimental” account given by animal liberationists. This strategy seems to play a major role in supporting merely limited reform in the use of animals and seems to support the assumption that there are conditions under which animals may be raised and slaughtered for food that are ethically acceptable. Reformists do not need to make this assumption, but they tend to conceptualize animal welfare is such a way that death does not count as harmful to the interests of animals, nor prolonged life a benefit. In addition to this prudential value assumption, some members of this community have developed strategies for defending suitably reformed farming practices as ethical even granting that death and some other forms of constraints are harms. One such strategy is the fiction of a domestic contract. However, if one accepts the conceptualization of human welfare give by L. W. Sumner, and applies it to animals in the way that I think is justified, an accurate conceptualization of animal welfare has different implications for which uses of animals should be regarded as ethically acceptable. In this paper I give an historical and philosophical account of animal welfare conceptulization and use this account to argue that animal breeders, as custodians of the animals they breed, have the ethical responsibility to help their animal wards achieve as much autonomy as possible in choosing the form of life made available to them and to provide that life. Attempts to avoid these implications by alluding to a contract model of the relationship between custodians and their wards fail to relieve custodians of their ethical responsibilities of care.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 9, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.