Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Robinson-García, D. Torres-Salinas, Zohreh Zahedi, R. Costas (2014)
New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.comArXiv, abs/1408.0135
(2015)
The journey from librametry to altmetry: A look into the past, Mezhdunar
William Hood, Concepción Wilson (2001)
The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and InformetricsScientometrics, 52
(2010)
The value of scientific publications in specialized journals
(2012)
Analysis of the effectiveness of scientometric indicators in the evaluation of scientific activity, Vestn
(2001)
Network communications in the professional community of sociologists : Methodology for content - analytical research of biographies
I. Ramos-Vielba, P. D’Este, Richard Woolley, N. Amara (2018)
Introduction to a special section: Balancing scientific and societal impact—A challenging agenda for academic researchScience and Public Policy, 45
N.V. Gorodnikova, L.M. Gokhberg, K.A. Ditkovskii, M.N. Kotsemir, I.A. Kuznetsova, E.I. Lukinova, S.V. Martynova, T.V. Ratai, L.A. Rosovetskaya, G.S. Sagieva, E.A. Strel’tsova, A.B. Suslov, I.I. Tarasenko, S.Yu. Fridlyanova, K.S. Fursov (2018)
Indikatory nauki: 2018: Stat. sb. (Indicators of Science: 2018: Statistical Book), Gokhberg, L.M., Kuz’minov, Ya.I.
(2017)
Nauchnyi potentsial Rossii za 2006–2014 gody: Analit.-stat
M.M. Waldrop (2008)
Science 2.0: Great new tool, or great risk?Sci. Am., 298
M. Schreiber, Chrisovaladis Malesios, S. Psarakis (2012)
Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h-type variants, and some traditional bibliometric indicatorsJ. Informetrics, 6
(2017)
Nauka, tekhnologii i innovatsii Rossii: Krat
(2017)
AUTOMATIC DOCUMENTATION AND MATHEMATICA Moscow : Inst . Probl . Razvit
Алексей Милославов (2015)
Science 2.0: новая научная парадигма или развитие инструментария исследовательской работы?
The place of altmetrics in quantitative methods for assessing scientific activity
(1999)
Institutional and ideological aspects of the functioning of science, Sotsiol
(2015)
Prospects for the use of altmetrics in the social sciences and humanities
(2013)
Bibliometric passion as a result of the lack of scientific expertise, Upr
(2002)
The influence of defuzzification methods on the tuning speed of a fuzzy model, Kibern
L. Bornmann, W. Marx (2018)
Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometricsArXiv, abs/1805.06153
(2013)
How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated
M. Medynskaya (2015)
Fuzzy set theory. The concept of fuzzy sets2015 XVIII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)
B. Dutta (2015)
The journey from librametry to altmetry: A look into the pastMezhdunar. Forum Inf., 40
(2013)
Construction of professional associations: From professional groups to expert communities
T.N. Varganova, I.V. Zinov’eva, S.N. Inozemtseva, V.A. Markusova, O.A. Solomentseva, M.A. Solopova, M.I. Kosarenkova (2017)
Nauchnyi potentsial Rossii za 2006–2014 gody: Analit.-stat. sb. (The Scientific Potential of Russia for 2006–2014: Analytical-Statistical Book)
(2013)
Altmetrics and libraries: Trends, opportunities, and problems, Vestn
(2015)
Theory of fuzzy sets. The concept of a fuzzy set, Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po myagkim vychisleniyam i izmereniyam (International
I.V. Zinov'eva, S.N. Inozemtseva, M.I. Kosarenkova, V.A. Markusova, L.E. Mindeli, O.A. Solomentseva, M.A. Solopova (2017)
Nauka, tekhnologii i innovatsii Rossii: Krat. stat. sb. (Science, Technology, and Innovation of Russia: Small Statistical Book)
ISSN 0005-1055, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 2019, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 179–188. © Allerton Press, Inc., 2019. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy, 2019, No. 8, pp. 28–38. INFORMATION ANALYSIS P. A. Kalachikhin* All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Russian Academy of Sciences (VINITI RAS), Moscow, 125190 Russia *e-mail: pakalachikhin@viniti.ru Received May 5, 2019 Abstract—In the article, the issues of normalization of scientometric indicators of the publication level were studied. An integrated approach to the evaluation of research results was formalized. The similarities and dif- ferences between professional and scientif ic communities were considered. The concept of a professional sci- entific community was introduced. Local and network subtypes of scientific communities were identified. A method has been developed for obtaining the values of scientometric indicators normalized by both local and network scientific communities, the distinguishing feature of which is the use of linguistic variables and pro- duction rules of fuzzy logic. The testing of the proposed methodology was carried out based on the example of a scientometric database. Keywords: altmetrics, bibliometric indicators, scientometric platforms, scientific community, professional community, network community DOI: 10.3103/S0005105519040071 INTRODUCTION research results carried
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 7, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.