Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison of protein phylogeny reconstruction methods using natural protein sequences

Comparison of protein phylogeny reconstruction methods using natural protein sequences Comparison of several protein phylogeny reconstruction methods was realized on a set of natural protein sequences. The programs of the PHYLIP package and FastME, PhyML and TreeTop programs were tested. In contrast to several studied programs that used simulated sequences, our results demonstrate the superiority of distance methods over the maximum likelihood method. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin Springer Journals

Comparison of protein phylogeny reconstruction methods using natural protein sequences

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/comparison-of-protein-phylogeny-reconstruction-methods-using-natural-l40TBX5GR8

References (11)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Allerton Press, Inc.
Subject
Life Sciences; Zoology ; Plant Sciences ; Life Sciences, general ; Cell Biology; Biochemistry, general
ISSN
0096-3925
eISSN
1934-791X
DOI
10.3103/S0096392510040036
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comparison of several protein phylogeny reconstruction methods was realized on a set of natural protein sequences. The programs of the PHYLIP package and FastME, PhyML and TreeTop programs were tested. In contrast to several studied programs that used simulated sequences, our results demonstrate the superiority of distance methods over the maximum likelihood method.

Journal

Moscow University Biological Sciences BulletinSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 29, 2010

There are no references for this article.