Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Marco Diana, L. Quadrifoglio, C. Pronello (2009)
A methodology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equivalent fixed-route and demand responsive transit servicesTransportation Planning and Technology, 32
(2003)
intermodality, sustainability and intelligent transport systems, pp
D O’Sullivan, GLW Perry (2013)
Spatial simulation: exploring pattern and process
Nicole Ronald, R. Thompson, S. Winter (2015)
Comparison of Constrained and Ad Hoc Demand-Responsive Transportation SystemsTransportation Research Record, 2563
J. Brake, C. Mulley, J. Nelson, S. Wright (2007)
Key lessons learned from recent experience with Flexible Transport ServicesTransport Policy, 14
L. Quadrifoglio, Xiugang Li (2009)
A methodology to derive the critical demand density for designing and operating feeder transit servicesTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 43
M. Horn (2002)
Multi-modal and demand-responsive passenger transport systems: a modelling framework with embedded control systemsTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 36
Nikola Marković, Rahul Nair, P. Schonfeld, Elise Miller-Hooks, Matthew, Mohebbi (2015)
Optimizing diala-ride services in Maryland : Benefits of computerized routing and scheduling 1
(2008)
Review of Victorian Taxi Costs
M. Enoch, S. Potter, G. Parkhurst, Mark Smith (2006)
Why do demand responsive transport systems fail
David Charypar, K. Nagel (2005)
Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithmsTransportation, 32
R Arnott, AD Palma, R Lindsey (1993)
A structural model of peak-period congestion: a traffic bottleneck with elastic demandAm Econ Rev, 83
(2006)
National guidelines for transport system management in Australia: Part 4 Urban Transport Beirão G
Nicole Ronald, R. Thompson, S. Winter (2015)
Modelling ad-hoc DR T over many days: a preliminary study
(2013)
Using a Multi-agent Simulation Tool to Estimate
S. Chang, Wen-Jeng Yu (1996)
Comparison of Subsidized Fixed- and Flexible-Route Bus SystemsTransportation Research Record, 1557
Zahra Kashani, Nicole Ronald, S. Winter (2016)
Comparing demand responsive and conventional public transport in a low demand context2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops)
J. Brake, J. Nelson (2007)
A case study of flexible solutions to transport demand in a deregulated environmentJournal of Transport Geography, 15
R. Arnott, A. Palma, R. Lindsey (1993)
A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PEAK-PERIOD CONGESTION: A TRAFFIC BOTTLENECK WITH ELASTIC DEMAND. IN: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS
Victor Pillac, M. Gendreau, C. Guéret, A. Medaglia (2013)
A review of dynamic vehicle routing problemsEur. J. Oper. Res., 225
Xiugang Li, L. Quadrifoglio (2010)
Feeder transit services: Choosing between fixed and demand responsive policyTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 18
B. Atasoy, T. Ikeda, X. Song, M. Ben-Akiva (2015)
The concept and impact analysis of a flexible mobility on demand systemTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 56
Kurt Palmer, M. Dessouky, Zhiqiang Zhou (2008)
Factors influencing productivity and operating cost of demand responsive transitTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 42
(2004)
21st international congress on modelling and simulation (MODSIM), pp 1175–1181
K. Axhausen (2008)
Large scale use of collective taxis A multi-agent approach
J. Nelson, S. Wright, B. Masson, G. Ambrosino, A. Naniopoulos (2010)
Recent developments in Flexible Transport ServicesResearch in Transportation Economics, 29
R. Dowling, A. Skabardonis, V. Alexiadis (2004)
Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software
Gerardo Berbeglia, J. Cordeau, G. Laporte (2010)
Dynamic pickup and delivery problemsEur. J. Oper. Res., 202
(2012)
A Policy Pract
M Wardman (2004)
Public transport values of timeTransp Policy, 11
Nicole Ronald, R. Thompson, John Haasz, S. Winter (2013)
Determining the Viability of a Demand-Responsive Transport System under Varying Demand Scenarios
David Charypar, K. Axhausen, K. Nagel (2007)
Event-Driven Queue-Based Traffic Flow MicrosimulationTransportation Research Record, 2003
Nicole Ronald, R. Thompson, S. Winter (2015)
Simulating Demand-responsive Transportation: A Review of Agent-based ApproachesTransport Reviews, 35
D. Hensher, P. Stopher, P. Bullock (2003)
Service quality––developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contractsTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 37
L. Quadrifoglio, M. Dessouky, F. Ordóñez (2008)
A simulation study of demand responsive transit system designTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 42
W. Jong, J. Vogels, K. Wijk, Otto Cazemier (2011)
The key factors for providing successful public transport in low-density areas in The NetherlandsResearch in transportation business and management, 2
Derek Edwards, K. Watkins (2013)
Comparing Fixed-Route and Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Systems in Real-World SettingsTransportation Research Record, 2352
Marco Diana, L. Quadrifoglio, C. Pronello (2007)
Emissions of demand responsive services as an alternative to conventional transit systemsTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 12
F. Errico, T. Crainic, F. Malucelli, M. Nonato (2013)
A survey on planning semi-flexible transit systems: Methodological issues and a unifying frameworkTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 36
M. Dessouky, M. Rahimi, M. Weidner (2003)
JOINTLY OPTIMIZING COST, SERVICE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSIT SCHEDULINGTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 8
Liping Fu (2002)
A simulation model for evaluating advanced dial-a-ride paratransit systemsTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 36
Kurt Palmer, M. Dessouky, Tamer Abdelmaguid (2004)
Impacts of management practices and advanced technologies on demand responsive transit systemsTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 38
J. Cordeau, G. Laporte (2003)
The Dial-a-Ride Problem (DARP): Variants, modeling issues and algorithmsQuarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies, 1
Gabriela Beirão, J. Cabral (2007)
Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative studyTransport Policy, 14
F. Deflorio, B. Chiara, A. Murro (2002)
Simulation and performance of DRTS in a realistic environment
J. Cordeau, G. Laporte (2006)
The dial-a-ride problem: models and algorithmsAnnals of Operations Research, 153
M Maciejewski (2016)
The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim
(2016)
Dynamic transport services , chap 23
(2007)
Demand Responsive Transit Development Program Design
(1996)
Transp Policy 14(6):458–466
L. Ferreira, P. Charles, C. Tether (2007)
Evaluating Flexible Transport SolutionsTransportation Planning and Technology, 30
J. Brake, J. Nelson, S. Wright (2004)
DEMAND RESPONSIVE TRANSPORT: TOWARDS THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW MARKET SEGMENTJournal of Transport Geography, 12
(2005)
HiTrans best practice guide: development of principles and strategies for introducing high quality public transport in medium sized cities and regions. 2. Public transport-planning the networks
Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York
C. Häll, Magdalena Högberg, J. Lundgren (2012)
A modeling system for simulation of dial-a-ride servicesPublic Transport, 4
Gregor L¨ammel, Christoph Dobler, Hubert Kl¨upfel (2016)
The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation
Wenli Gao (2009)
Comparisons between MATSim and EMME/2 on the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area Network
Considering the sprawl of cities, conventional public transport with fixed route and fixed schedule becomes less efficient and desirable every day. However, emerging technologies in computation and communication are facilitating more adaptive types of public transport systems, such as demand responsive transport that operates according to real-time demand. It is crucial to study the feasibility and advantages of these novel systems before implementation to prevent failure and financial loss. In this work, an extensive comparison of demand responsive transport and conventional public transport is provided by incorporating a dynamic routing algorithm into an agent-based traffic simulation. The results show that replacing conventional public transport with demand responsive transport will improve the mobility by decreasing the perceived travel time by passengers without any extra cost under certain circumstances. The simulation results are confirmed for different forms of networks, including a real-world network proving the potential of demand responsive transport to solve the challenge of underutilised conventional public transport in suburban areas with low transport demand.
Public Transport – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 6, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.