Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison and Möbius Quasi-invariance Properties of Ibragimov’s Metric

Comparison and Möbius Quasi-invariance Properties of Ibragimov’s Metric For a domain D⊊Rn\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ D \subsetneq {\mathbb {R}}^{n} $$\end{document}, Ibragimov’s metric is defined as uD(x,y)=2log|x-y|+max{d(x),d(y)}d(x)d(y),x,y∈D,\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\begin{aligned} u_{D}(x,y) = 2\, \log \frac{|x-y|+\max \{d(x),d(y)\}}{\sqrt{d(x)\,d(y)}}, \quad \quad x,y \in D, \end{aligned}$$\end{document}where d(x) denotes the Euclidean distance from x to the boundary of D. In this paper, we compare Ibragimov’s metric with the classical hyperbolic metric in the unit ball or in the upper half space, and prove sharp comparison inequalities between Ibragimov’s metric and some hyperbolic type metrics. We also obtain several sharp distortion inequalities for Ibragimov’s metric under some families of Möbius transformations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Computational Methods and Function Theory Springer Journals

Comparison and Möbius Quasi-invariance Properties of Ibragimov’s Metric

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/comparison-and-m-bius-quasi-invariance-properties-of-ibragimov-s-y8iyfnSdK1
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
ISSN
1617-9447
eISSN
2195-3724
DOI
10.1007/s40315-021-00414-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

For a domain D⊊Rn\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ D \subsetneq {\mathbb {R}}^{n} $$\end{document}, Ibragimov’s metric is defined as uD(x,y)=2log|x-y|+max{d(x),d(y)}d(x)d(y),x,y∈D,\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\begin{aligned} u_{D}(x,y) = 2\, \log \frac{|x-y|+\max \{d(x),d(y)\}}{\sqrt{d(x)\,d(y)}}, \quad \quad x,y \in D, \end{aligned}$$\end{document}where d(x) denotes the Euclidean distance from x to the boundary of D. In this paper, we compare Ibragimov’s metric with the classical hyperbolic metric in the unit ball or in the upper half space, and prove sharp comparison inequalities between Ibragimov’s metric and some hyperbolic type metrics. We also obtain several sharp distortion inequalities for Ibragimov’s metric under some families of Möbius transformations.

Journal

Computational Methods and Function Theory – Springer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2022

Keywords: Ibragimov’s metric; Hyperbolic metric; Hyperbolic type metrics; Möbius transformations; 30F45 (51M10)

References

  • Lipschitz conditions, triangular ratio metric, and quasiconformal mappings
    Chen, J; Hariri, P; Klén, R; Vuorinen, M
  • Quasiconformally homogeneous domains
    Gehring, FW; Palka, BP
  • Uniform domains and the quasihyperbolic metric
    Gehring, FW; Osgood, BG
  • Inequalities and bi-Lipschitz conditions for the triangular ratio metric
    Hariri, P; Vuorinen, M; Zhang, X
  • Isometries of the half-Apollonian metric
    Hästö, P; Lindén, H
  • Gromov hyperbolicity of the jG\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$j_{G}$$\end{document} and j~G\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\tilde{j}_{G}$$\end{document} metrics
    Hästö, P
  • Hyperbolizing metric spaces
    Ibragimov, Z
  • Möbius invariant Cassinian metric
    Ibragimov, Z
  • Geometry of the Cassinian metric and its inner metric
    Ibragimov, Z; Mohapatra, MR; Sahoo, SK; Zhang, X
  • The visual angle metric and Möbius transformations
    Klén, R; Lindén, H; Vuorinen, M; Wang, G
  • A Gromov hyperbolic metric vs the hyperbolic and other related metrics
    Mohapatra, MR; Sahoo, SK
  • Mapping properties of a scale invariant Cassinian metric and a Gromov hyperbolic metric
    Mohapatra, MR; Sahoo, SK
  • Möbius-invariant metrics
    Seittenranta, P
  • Sharp Lipschitz constants for the distance ratio metric
    Simić, S; Vuorinen, M; Wang, G
  • The visual angle metric and quasiregular maps
    Wang, G; Vuorinen, M
  • Sharp inequalities for the scale invariant Cassinian metric
    Xu, X; Wang, G
  • Comparison between a Gromov hyperbolic metric and the hyperbolic metric
    Zhang, X
  • The visual angle metric and quasiregular maps
    G Wang, M Vuorinen
  • Sharp inequalities for the scale invariant Cassinian metric
    X Xu, G Wang
  • Comparison between a Gromov hyperbolic metric and the hyperbolic metric
    X Zhang