Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
DM Secko, N Preto, S Niemeyer, MM Burgess (2009)
Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debateSocial Science & Medicine, 68
M Levitt, S Weldon (2005)
A well placed trust? Public perception of the governance of DNA databasesCritical Public Health, 15
NR Sudarsan, L Jandorf, DO Erwin (2011)
Multi-site implementation of health education programs for LatinasJournal of Community Health, 36
J Murphy, J Scott, D Kaufman, G Geller, L LeRoy, K Hudson (2009)
Public perspectives on informed consent for biobankingAm J Public Health, 99
SS Wang, F Fridinger, KM Sheedy, MJ Khoury (2001)
Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic researchCommunity Genetics, 4
JS Luque, GP Quinn, FA Montel-Ishino, M Arevalo, SA Bynum, S Noel-Thomas, KJ Wells, CK Gwede, CD Meade (2012)
Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members thinkJ Cancer Educ, 27
F Wood, J Kowalczuk, G Elwyn, C Mitchell, J Gallacher (2011)
Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destinationJournal of Medical Ethics, 37
J Sanner, L Frazier (2007)
Factors that influence the characteristics of genetic biobanksJ Nurs Scholarsh, 39
G Corbie-Smith, C Blumenthal, G Henderson, J Garrett, J Bussey-Jones, M Moloney, RS Sandler, SW Lloyd, J Dorrance, J Darter (2008)
Studying genetic research participants: lessons from the “learning about research in North Carolina” studyCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 17
CB Ambrosone, MK Nesline, W Davis (2006)
Establishing a cancer center data bank and biorepository for multidisciplinary researchCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15
LM Beskow, E Dean (2008)
Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants’ understanding and opinionsCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention, 17
Reported barriers to participation in biospecimen banking include unwillingness to undergo blood-draw procedures and concerns about confidentiality breaches, privacy, and discrimination. The study identified key factors and influential perspectives to address these barriers and inform methods to improve recruitment and research participation among racially diverse community. A mixed-methods, community-based participatory research orientation was used to collect formative findings to develop a pilot intervention. Methods included nine key informant interviews, three focus groups (n = 26), and 64 community surveys. Findings showed: (1) increased concern of exploitation by pharmaceutical company sponsor; (2) varied perceptions about monetary compensation for research participation; and (3) willingness to participate in a biospecimen banking study by more than 30% of the people in the community survey. Research participation and biospecimen donation may be influenced by who is sponsoring a study. Monetary incentives for study participation may be more important for African American than White participants.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 9, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.