Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Janvier, P. Tassy, H. Thomas (1980)
Le cladismeLa Recherche, 11
A.L. Takhtajan (1973)
Evolution and Ausbreitung der Blütenpflanzen
R. Thorne (1976)
A Phylogenetic Classification of the Angiospermae
(1979)
Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology
H. Wernham (1911)
Floral evolution : with particular reference to the Sympetalous dicotyledonsNew Phytologist, 10
L. Valen (1978)
Why not be a cladist?Evol. Theor., 3
S. Gould (1980)
The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary disciplinePaleobiology, 6
L. Watrous, Q. Wheeler (1981)
The Out-Group Comparison Method of Character AnalysisSystematic Biology, 30
L. Parenti (1980)
A phylogenetic analysis of the land plantsBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 13
R. Dahlgren (1980)
A revised system of classification of the angiospermsBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 80
E.O. Wiley (1980)
Must phylogenetic classification be so complicated?Syst. Zool., 29
P. Stevens (1980)
Evolutionary Polarity of Character StatesAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 11
A. Cronquist (1977)
The compositae revisitedBrittonia, 29
W. Hennig (1966)
Phylogenetic systematics
N. Platnick (1979)
Philosophy and the Transformation of CladisticsSystematic Biology, 28
H. Wanntorp (1980)
THEORY AND DOGMA IN SYSTEMATICSTaxon, 29
C. Berg (1978)
Cecropiaceae a new family of the Urticales.Taxon, 27
H. Clifford (1977)
Quantitative Studies of Inter-relationships Amongst the Liliatae
E. Wiley (1980)
Must Phylogenetic Classifications be so ComplicatedSystematic Biology, 29
W.C. Burger (1977)
The Piperales and the Monocots - Alternate hypotheses for the origin of monocotyledonous flowersBot. Rev., 43
N.I. Platnick (1979)
Philosophy and the transformation of cladisticsSyst. Zool., 28
U. Hamann (1976)
Hydatellaceae — a new family of monocotyledoneaeNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 14
P. Ashlock (1979)
An Evolutionary Systematist's View of ClassificationSystematic Biology, 28
W. Vent (1972)
Takhtajan, Armen, Flowering Plants, Origin and Dispersal. 310 S., 32 Abb., 13 Tafeln. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburg, 1969. Preis: £ 2 10 sFeddes Repertorium, 82
A. Takhtadzhi︠a︡n (1959)
Die Evolution der Angiospermen
A. Takhtajan (1983)
Outline of the classification of flowering plants (magnoliophyta)Brittonia, 35
S. Gould (1981)
What, if anything, is a zebra?Natural History, 907
J. Cracraft (1974)
PHYLOGENETIC MODELS AND CLASSIFICATIONSystematic Biology, 23
H. Hallier (1912)
L'origine et le système phylétique des Angiospermes exposés à l'aide de leur arbre généalogiqueArch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Nat. Ser. 3, 1
A.L. Takhtajan (1966)
Sistema i filogeniya Tsvetkovykh Rastenii (Système et phylogénie des plantes à fleurs)
P.D. Ashlock (1979)
An evolutionary systematist's view of classificationSyst. Zool., 28
D. Barabé, Y. Bergeron, G.A. Vincent (1981)
Relations phénétiques entre les familles d'HamamelididaeExperientia, 37
R. Jong (1980)
Some tools for evolutionary and phylogenetic studiesZ.Zool. Syst. Evolut. -forsch., 18
C. Metcalfe, L. Chalk, D. Cutler, M. Gregory (1950)
Anatomy of the dicotyledons
J. Genermont (1980)
Trois conceptions modernes en taxinomie: taxinomie cladistique, taxinomie évolutive, taxinomie phénétiqueAnn. Biol., 19
J. Cracraft (1974)
Phylogenetic models and classificationSyst. Zool., 23
T. Duncan, R. Phillips, W. Wagner (1980)
A Comparison of Branching Diagrams Derived by Various Phenetic and Cladistic MethodsSystematic Botany, 5
A. Cronquist (1978)
The zingiberidae, a new subclass of liliopsida (Monocotyledons)Brittonia, 30
D. Hull (1979)
THE LIMITS OF CLADISMSystematic Biology, 28
A.L. Takhtajan (1969)
Flowering plants. Origin and dispersal
R. Sattler, V. Singh (1978)
Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the AlismatalesBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 77
C. Bessey
The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants
J. McNeill (1979)
STRUCTURAL VALUE: A CONCEPT USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF TAXONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONSTaxon, 28
Edith Smoot, R. Jansen, T. Taylor (1981)
A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE LAND PLANTS: A BOTANICAL COMMENTARYTaxon, 30
K. Bremer, H. Wanntorp (1978)
PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS IN BOTANYTaxon, 27
E. Wiley (1980)
Phylogenetic Systematics and Vicariance BiogeographySystematic Botany, 5
W.C. Burger (1979)
Cladistic: useful tool or rigid dogma?Taxon, 28
B. Schaeffer, M. Hecht, N. Eldredge (1972)
Phylogeny and Paleontology
D.L. Hull (1979)
The limits of cladismSyst. Zool., 28
The authors analyze Takhtajan's system of classification of the Angiosperms in relation to the principles of evolutionary and cladistic systematics. It is shown that Takhtajan belongs to the evolutionary school: he identifies the ancestors of some taxa, he accepts polytomous branching and he groups taxa on the basis of primitive as well as derived character states. Takhtajan's notion of weighted similarity does not appear to be based on objective criteria, when determining the weight and evolutionary status of characters.
Acta Biotheoretica – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 11, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.