Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

CIDOC data modeling working group

CIDOC data modeling working group STANDARDS Nick Crofts and Pat Reed, Co-Chairs At the ICOM meeting in Stavanger, Norway, the Data Model Working Group and the Data Terminology Working Group merged and became the Data Standards Working Group. Each of the former groups presented a product: the CIDOC Relational Data Model of the Data Model Working Group and the Informa- tion Categories Guidelines of the Data Terminology Working Group. Project plans of the Data Standards Working Group in- eluded mapping three data standards to the CIDOC Relational Data Model: Archaeological Sites, Ethnology, and Information Categories Guidelines. The working group plans also to conduct a workshop in Nairobi, details for which are not complete at this time. The Data Standards Working Group held an interim meeting in Heraklion,Crete, Greece, March 6 - 8 to discuss object-oriented (O-O) methods and techniques for extending and enriching the CIDOC Relational Data Model: Following presentations, demon- strations, and much discussion, the group agreed to the following: (I) Future CIDOC data models will be developed using O-O methods, techniques, and formats. While this effort is under way, the current CIDOC Relational Data Model will be available, although it will not be modified or enhanced. The 0-0 model wilt retain all http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives and Museum Informatics Springer Journals

CIDOC data modeling working group

Archives and Museum Informatics , Volume 10 (1): 3 – Mar 1, 1996

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/cidoc-data-modeling-working-group-BSBXsF9uyQ

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
1996 Archives & Museum Informatics
ISSN
1042-1467
eISSN
1573-7500
DOI
10.1007/BF02802421
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

STANDARDS Nick Crofts and Pat Reed, Co-Chairs At the ICOM meeting in Stavanger, Norway, the Data Model Working Group and the Data Terminology Working Group merged and became the Data Standards Working Group. Each of the former groups presented a product: the CIDOC Relational Data Model of the Data Model Working Group and the Informa- tion Categories Guidelines of the Data Terminology Working Group. Project plans of the Data Standards Working Group in- eluded mapping three data standards to the CIDOC Relational Data Model: Archaeological Sites, Ethnology, and Information Categories Guidelines. The working group plans also to conduct a workshop in Nairobi, details for which are not complete at this time. The Data Standards Working Group held an interim meeting in Heraklion,Crete, Greece, March 6 - 8 to discuss object-oriented (O-O) methods and techniques for extending and enriching the CIDOC Relational Data Model: Following presentations, demon- strations, and much discussion, the group agreed to the following: (I) Future CIDOC data models will be developed using O-O methods, techniques, and formats. While this effort is under way, the current CIDOC Relational Data Model will be available, although it will not be modified or enhanced. The 0-0 model wilt retain all

Journal

Archives and Museum InformaticsSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 1, 1996

There are no references for this article.