Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
BOOK REVIEWS 203 She utilizes a contextual – historical analysis in her discussion of Shelly and Bion as she addresses Bion ’ s preoccupations and language style. She writes: “ Bion ’ s clinical drama on the couch can be read as a kind of back-formation that leads by way of Shelly ’ s Prometheus Unbound to a reclamation of the eighteenth-century aesthetic discourse of the Sublime ” (p. 212). This is a rich densely packed scholarly collection of essays that threads together British object relations psychoanalysis as a valid and unique form of discourse. The chapters are sequenced chronologically more or less, but they can also be read out of the larger context of the book as separate essays. What is unique about this book is that it is not a typical applied psychoanalysis. Rather, it is an elaboration of the object relations school in relation to literature, art and its links to the continental threads in psychoanalysis. This book seems most likely of interest to the reader interested in literary criticism, cultural theory and the arts as they are expressed by this particular school of psychoanalysis. Paul C. Cooper , L.P., NCPsy.A. 145 E. 35th St. #5FE
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis – Springer Journals
Published: May 10, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.