Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimal invasive potentially curative local ablative tumour treatment with very low morbidity and mortality rates as compared to surgery. The question arises whether RFA can replace liver resection. Recent studies have shown that patient long-term survival data after RFA approach the resection data despite inclusion of patients with a poorer prognosis due to comorbidities or disadvantageous tumour distribution. However, since most of the data still favour resection conventional RFA is currently only considered the primary local tumour treatment in combination with surgery or in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Recent improvements in ablation technology and the application of stereotaxy for probe placement have led to local control rates approaching the rates of R0 resections. If stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) achieves similar survival rates as compared to resection it may be the method of first choice in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases. Randomised controlled studies comparing resection and SRFA could finally answer the title question.
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 30, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.