Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, K. Koay, D. Syrdal, Chrystopher Nehaniv (2009)
An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics
T. Oosterhout, Arnoud Visser (2008)
A visual method for robot proxemics measurementsCTIT technical reports series
Ross Mead, Eric Wade, Pierre Johnson, A. Clair, Shuya Chen, M. Matarić (2010)
An architecture for rehabilitation task practice in socially assistive human-robot interaction19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication
I. Kastanis, M. Slater (2012)
Reinforcement learning utilizes proxemics: An avatar learns to manipulate the position of people in immersive virtual realityACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 9
H. Hüttenrauch, K. Eklundh, A. Green, E. Topp (2006)
Investigating Spatial Relationships in Human-Robot Interaction2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
L. Hayduk, S. Mainprize (1980)
Personal space of the blind.Social psychology quarterly, 43 2
M. Argyle, Janet Dean (1965)
EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION.Sociometry, 28
日本規格協会 (2004)
Acoustics : normal equal-loudness-level contours = 音響 : 正常な音の大きさの等感曲線
Ross Mead, Amin Atrash, M. Matarić (2012)
Representations of Proxemic Behavior for Human-Machine Interaction
J. Burgoon, L. Stern, Leesa Dillman (1995)
Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns
J. Bailenson, Christopher Rex, A. Beall, J. Loomis (2001)
Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual EnvironmentsPresence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10
Ross Mead, Amin Atrash, M. Matarić (2013)
Automated Proxemic Feature Extraction and Behavior Recognition: Applications in Human-Robot InteractionInternational Journal of Social Robotics, 5
P. Shalit (1964)
The Silent LanguageJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 2
Alan Lipman, E. Hall (1970)
The Hidden DimensionBritish Journal of Sociology, 21
Andrew Brooks, R. Arkin (2007)
Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robotAutonomous Robots, 22
(1972)
Nonverbal communication. Aldine Transcation: Piscataway
(1963)
A system for notation of proxemic behavior
L. Takayama, C. Pantofaru (2009)
Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Brian Gerkey (2008)
Planning and Control in Unstructured Terrain
Asli Ozyurek (2002)
Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational GesturesJournal of Memory and Language, 46
Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Eric Berger, Tully Foote, Brian Gerkey, K. Konolige (2010)
The Office Marathon: Robust navigation in an indoor office environment2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Pete Trautman, Andreas Krause (2010)
Unfreezing the robot: Navigation in dense, interacting crowds2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Jonathan Mumm, Bilge Mutlu (2011)
Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
H. Kuzuoka, Yuya Suzuki, J. Yamashita, K. Yamazaki (2010)
Reconfiguring spatial formation arrangement by robot body orientation2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
T. Mallenby, R. Mallenby (1975)
The personal space of hard-of-hearing children after extended contact with 'normals'.The British journal of social and clinical psychology, 14 3
Nicolai Marquardt, S. Greenberg (2012)
Informing the Design of Proxemic InteractionsIEEE Pervasive Computing, 11
A. Tapus, M. Matarić, B. Scassellati (2007)
The Grand Challenges in Socially Assistive RoboticsIEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14
L. Rabiner (1989)
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognitionProc. IEEE, 77
Ross Mead, M. Matarić (2015)
Robots Have Needs Too: People Adapt Their Proxemic Preferences to Improve Autonomous Robot Recognition of Human Social Signals
(1959)
1959).The silent language.NewYork:DoubledayCompany
I Kastanis, M Slater (2012)
Reinforcement learning utilizes proxemics: An avatar learns to manipulate the position of people in immersive virtual realityTransactions on Applied Perception, 9
David Feil-Seifer, M. Matarić (2011)
People-aware navigation for goal-oriented behavior involving a human partner2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), 2
D. Fox, Wolfram Burgard, S. Thrun (1997)
The dynamic window approach to collision avoidanceIEEE Robotics Autom. Mag., 4
Ross Mead, M. Matarić (2015)
Proxemics and performance: Subjective human evaluations of autonomous sociable robot distance and social signal understanding2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
M. Quigley (2009)
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System
David Feil-Seifer, M. Matarić (2011)
Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
E Schegloff (1998)
Body torqueSocial Research, 65
D. McNeill (2005)
Gesture and Thought
Ross Mead, M. Matarić (2012)
A probabilistic framework for autonomous proxemic control in situated and mobile human-robot interaction2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
N. Rossini (2003)
The Analysis of Gesture: Establishing a Set of Parameters
Ross Mead, M. Matarić (2014)
Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics
To enable situated human–robot interaction (HRI), an autonomous robot must both understand and control proxemics—the social use of space—to employ natural communication mechanisms analogous to those used by humans. This work presents a computational framework of proxemics based on data-driven probabilistic models of how social signals (speech and gesture) are produced (by a human) and perceived (by a robot). The framework and models were implemented as autonomous proxemic behavior systems for sociable robots, including: (1) a sampling-based method for robot proxemic goal state estimation with respect to human–robot distance and orientation parameters, (2) a reactive proxemic controller for goal state realization, and (3) a cost-based trajectory planner for maximizing automated robot speech and gesture recognition rates along a path to the goal state. Evaluation results indicate that the goal state estimation and realization significantly improve upon past work in human–robot proxemics with respect to “interaction potential”—predicted automated speech and gesture recognition rates as the robot enters into and engages in face-to-face social encounters with a human user—illustrating their efficacy to support richer robot perception and autonomy in HRI.
Autonomous Robots – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 7, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.