Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P Brown, P deSouza, R Mercer, V Pietra, J Lai (1992)
Class-based n-gram models of natural languageJournal of Computational Linguistics, 18
C Chang, C Lin (2011)
LIBSVM: a library for support vector machinesACM Trans Intell Syst Technol, 2
B Hachey, W Radford, J Nothman, M Honnibal, J Curran (2013)
Evaluating entity linking with wikipediaJournal of Artificial Intelligence, 194
T Katayama (2010)
The curent status of the art of the 21st coe programs in the information sciences field. verifiable and evolvable e-society?realization of trustworthy e-society by computer science - (in japanese)Journal of Information Processing Society of Japan, 46
W Soon, D Lim, H Ng (2001)
A machine learning approach to co-reference resolution of noun phrasesIn Journal of Computational Linguistics, 27
V Vapnik (1998)
Statistical Learning Theory
N Bach, N NL Minh, A Shimazu (2011)
Rre task: The task of recognition of requisite part and effectuation part in law sentencesInternational Journal of Computer Processing Of Languages (IJCPOL), 23
T Katayama, A Shimazu, S Tojo, K Futatsugi, K Ochimizu (2008)
e-society and legal engineering (in japanese)Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 23
This paper investigates the task of reference resolution in the legal domain. This is a new interesting task in Legal Engineering research. The goal is to create a system which can automatically detect references and then extracts their referents. Previous work limits itself to detect and resolve references at the document targets. In this paper, we go a step further in trying to resolve references to sub-document targets. Referents extracted are the smallest fragments of texts in documents, rather than the entire documents that contain the referenced texts. Based on analyzing the characteristics of reference phenomena in legal texts, we propose a four-step framework to deal with the task: mention detection, contextual information extraction, antecedent candidate extraction, and antecedent determination. We also show how machine learning methods can be exploited in each step. The final system achieves 80.06 % in the F1 score for detecting references, 85.61 % accuracy for resolving them, and 67.02 % in the F1 score for the end-to-end setting task on the Japanese National Pension Law corpus.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.