Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Cowen, Andreas Pederson, H. Babigian, Louis Isso, Mary Trost (1973)
Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 41 3
A. Klein, R. Young (1979)
Hyperactive boys in their classroom: Assessment of teacher and peer perceptions, interactions, and classroom behaviorsJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7
J. Rolf (1976)
Peer status and the directionality of symptomatic behavior: prime social competence predictors of outcome for vulnerable children.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 46 1
J. Worland, M. North-Jones, J. Stern (1973)
Performance and activity of hyperactive and normal boys as a function of distraction and rewardJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1
M. Chandler (1973)
Egocentrism and antisocial behavior: The assessment and training of social perspective-taking skills.Developmental Psychology, 9
H. Abikoff, R. Gittelman, D. Klein (1980)
Classroom observation code for hyperactive children: a replication of validity.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 48 5
S. Stager, R. Young (1982)
A self-concept measure for preschool and early primary grade children.Journal of personality assessment, 46 5
C. Whalen, B. Henker, B. Collins, S. McAuliffe, A. Vaux (1979)
Peer interaction in a structured communication task: comparisons of normal and hyperactive boys and of methylphenidate (Ritalin) and placebo effects.Child development, 50 2
R. L. Sprague, M. N. Cohen, J. S. Werry (1974)
Technical Report of the Institute of Child Behavior and Development
V. Douglas, Kenneth Peters (1979)
Toward a Clearer Definition of the Attentional Deficit of Hyperactive Children
J. Darley, R. Fazio (1980)
Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.American Psychologist, 35
M. Roberts, R. Milich, J. Loney, J. Caputo (1981)
A multitrait-multimethod analysis of variance of teachers' ratings of aggression, hyperactivity, and inattentionJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9
W. Hartup, J. Glazer, R. Charlesworth (1967)
Peer reinforcement and sociometric status.Child development, 38 4
R. Milich, S. Landau (1982)
Socialization and peer relations in hyperactive children, 1
C. Conners (1969)
A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.The American journal of psychiatry, 126 6
Cheryl King, R. Young (1981)
Peer popularity and peer communication patterns: Hyperactive versus active but normal boysJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9
J. Gottman, Jonni Gonso, B. Rasmussen (1975)
Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children.Child development, 46 3
R. Prinz, P. Connor, C. Wilson (1981)
Hyperactive and aggressive behaviors in childhood: Intertwined dimensionsJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9
Patricia Agnew, R. Young (1979)
Verbal Mediation, Cognitive Tempo, and Self-Esteem in Normal-Active, High-Active and Hyperactive Boys.
J. Werry, R. Sprague, Miye Cohen (1975)
Conners' Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children — An empirical studyJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3
B. Lahey, K. Green, R. Forehand (1980)
On the independence of ratings of hyperactivity, conduct problems, and attention deficits in children: a multiple regression analysis.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 48 5
N. Lambert, J. Sandoval, D. Sassone (1978)
Prevalence of hyperactivity in elementary school children as a function of social system definers.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 48 3
The present study assessed teacher and peer perceptions of boys classified according to DSM-III criteria for Attention Deficit with Hyperactivity (ADH) and Attention Deficit without Hyperactivity (AD). Teachers completed SNAP checklists (Pelham, Note 1) on all boys in their classrooms (219 boys). Twelve percent fit ADH criteria; less than 5% fit AD criteria. Teacher perceptions were assessed with the Conners Teacher Rating Scale. ADH and AD groups did not differ on the Inattention factor, although the AD group was rated significantly lower than the ADH group on Conduct Problems and Hyperactivity. These profiles were expected on the basis of DSM-III descriptions of ADH and AD; the ADH group seemed to resemble previous research samples of hyperactive children. Classroom peer perceptions, assessed with like-dislike nominations, did not discriminate between diagnostic groups. Both groups were perceived more negatively than the Comparison group, suggesting that both groups are “at risk”.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.