Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω

Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω We investigate splitting number and reaping number for the structure (ω) ω of infinite partitions of ω. We prove that $${\mathfrak{r}_{d}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N}),\mathfrak{d}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d}\geq\mathfrak{b}}$$ . We also show the consistency results $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ . To prove the consistency $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ we introduce new cardinal invariants $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ . We also study the relation between $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}, \mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ and other cardinal invariants. We show that $${\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{N})\leq\mathfrak{r}_{pair}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{d},\mathfrak{r}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{pair}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N})}$$ . http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archive for Mathematical Logic Springer Journals

Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω

Archive for Mathematical Logic , Volume 49 (4) – Mar 27, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/around-splitting-and-reaping-for-partitions-of-Bxs0KfS0EJ

References (21)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Mathematics; Algebra; Mathematics, general; Mathematical Logic and Foundations
ISSN
0933-5846
eISSN
1432-0665
DOI
10.1007/s00153-010-0184-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We investigate splitting number and reaping number for the structure (ω) ω of infinite partitions of ω. We prove that $${\mathfrak{r}_{d}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N}),\mathfrak{d}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d}\geq\mathfrak{b}}$$ . We also show the consistency results $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ . To prove the consistency $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ we introduce new cardinal invariants $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ . We also study the relation between $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}, \mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ and other cardinal invariants. We show that $${\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{N})\leq\mathfrak{r}_{pair}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{d},\mathfrak{r}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{pair}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N})}$$ .

Journal

Archive for Mathematical LogicSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 27, 2010

There are no references for this article.