Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Blass, S. Shelah (1987)
There may be simple Paleph1 and Paleph2-points and the Rudin-Keisler ordering may be downward directedAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 33
L. Halbeisen (2001)
On Shattering, Splitting and Reaping PartitionsMathematical Logic Quarterly, 44
A. Blass (2010)
Combinatorial Cardinal Characteristics of the Continuum
L. Bukovský (2011)
The Structure of the Real Line
J. Cichon, A. Krawczyk, B. Majcher-Iwanow, B. Weglorz (2000)
Dualization of the van Douwen diagramJournal of Symbolic Logic, 65
S. Shelah (1998)
Proper and Improper Forcing
Matthew Foreman, Akihiro Kanamori (2010)
Handbook of Set Theory
A. Miller (1981)
Some properties of measure and categoryTransactions of the American Mathematical Society, 266
J. Brendle (2006)
Van Douwen's diagram for dense sets of rationalsAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 143
B. Balcar, F. Hernández-Hernández, M. Hrusák (2004)
Combinatorics of dense subsets of the rationalsFundamenta Mathematicae, 183
O. Spinas (1997)
Partition numbersAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 90
J. Brendle (2000)
Martin's Axiom and the Dual Distributivity NumberMath. Log. Q., 46
E. Douwen (1984)
The Integers and Topology
A. Kamburelis, B. Wȩglorz (1996)
SplittingsArch. Math. Log., 35
T. Carlson, S. Simpson (1984)
A Dual Form of Ramsey's TheoremAdvances in Mathematics, 53
A. Blass, S. Shelah (1987)
There may be simple $${{P}_{\aleph_{1}}}$$ and $${{P}_{\aleph_{2}}}$$ -points and the Rudin–Keisler ordering may be downward directedAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 33
P. Matet (1986)
Partitions and filtersJournal of Symbolic Logic, 51
M. Hrusák, D. Meza-Alcántara, Hiroaki Minami (2010)
Pair-splitting, pair-reaping and cardinal invariants of Fσ-idealsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 75
S. Shelah (1998)
Proper and Improper Forcing, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic
J. Baumgartner, P. Dordal (1985)
Adjoining dominating functionsJournal of Symbolic Logic, 50
T. Bartoszynski, Haim Judah (1995)
Set Theory: On the Structure of the Real Line
We investigate splitting number and reaping number for the structure (ω) ω of infinite partitions of ω. We prove that $${\mathfrak{r}_{d}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N}),\mathfrak{d}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d}\geq\mathfrak{b}}$$ . We also show the consistency results $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ . To prove the consistency $${\mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}$$ we introduce new cardinal invariants $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ . We also study the relation between $${\mathfrak{r}_{pair}, \mathfrak{s}_{pair}}$$ and other cardinal invariants. We show that $${\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{N})\leq\mathfrak{r}_{pair}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{d},\mathfrak{r}}$$ and $${\mathfrak{s}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{pair}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N})}$$ .
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 27, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.