Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning

Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Artificial Intelligence and Law Springer Journals

Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning

Artificial Intelligence and Law , Volume 9 (1) – Oct 19, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/argument-construction-and-reinstatement-in-logics-for-defeasible-gOzJuJbKmx
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Computer Science; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law; Philosophy of Law; Legal Aspects of Computing; Information Storage and Retrieval
ISSN
0924-8463
eISSN
1572-8382
DOI
10.1023/A:1011288805074
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning.

Journal

Artificial Intelligence and LawSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 19, 2004

References