Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Chakladar, Shankar Chakraborty (2008)
A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selectionProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222
Shu-Jen Chen, C. Hwang (1992)
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods
S. Gauri, R. Chakravorty, S. Chakraborty (2011)
Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) processThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 53
C. Hwang, K. Yoon (1981)
Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Chia-Jung Hu, Pee-Yew Lee, Jium‐Shyong Chen (2002)
Ballistic performance and microstructure of modified rolled homogeneous armor steelJournal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 25
R. Shanmugavel, Purusothaman Mokkandi, M. Jayamani, N. Rajini, M. Uthayakumar, S. Thirumalaikumaran (2017)
Mechanical and Machinability characteristics of Al–NiTi composites reinforced with SiC particulatesJournal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 53
I. Karakurt, G. Aydin, K. Aydiner (2012)
An Experimental Study on the Depth of Cut of Granite in Abrasive Waterjet CuttingMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 27
R. Manivannan, M. Kumar (2016)
Multi-response optimization of Micro-EDM process parameters on AISI304 steel using TOPSISJournal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30
Ravindranadh Bobbili, V. Madhu, A. Gogia (2013)
Effect of Wire-EDM Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate of High Strength Armor SteelMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 28
Ankita Singh, S. Datta, S. Mahapatra (2011)
Application of TOPSIS in the Taguchi Method for Optimal Machining Parameter SelectionJournal for Manufacturing Science & Production, 11
N. Yuvaraj, M. Kumar (2015)
Multiresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters Using TOPSIS ApproachMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 30
A Kumar, RN Rai (2020)
Grey-Taguchi and TOPSIS-Taguchi-based optimisation of performance parameters of Spark EDM on heat-treated AA7050 / 5 B4C compositeJ Inst Eng India Ser D, 101
S. Maity, S. Chakraborty (2013)
Grinding Wheel Abrasive Material Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS MethodMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 28
Majid Behzadian, S. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, Joshua Ignatius (2012)
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applicationsExpert Syst. Appl., 39
Arvind Kumar, R. Rai (2020)
Grey-Taguchi and TOPSIS-Taguchi-Based Optimisation of Performance Parameters of Spark EDM on Heat-Treated AA7050/5 B4C CompositeJournal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 101
R. Rao (2006)
Machinability evaluation of work materials using a combined multiple attribute decision-making methodThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28
M. Uthayakumar, M. Khan, S. Kumaran, Adam Słota, J. Zajac (2016)
Machinability of Nickel-Based Superalloy by Abrasive Water Jet MachiningMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 31
David Olson (2004)
Comparison of weights in TOPSIS modelsMath. Comput. Model., 40
P. Thamizhvalavan, S. Arivazhagan, N. Yuvaraj, B. Ramesh (2018)
Machinability study of abrasive aqua jet parameters on hybrid metal matrix compositeMaterials and Manufacturing Processes, 34
O. Chau, C. Parkan (1995)
Selection of a manufacturing process with multiple attributes: A case studyJournal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12
S. Raj, S. Prabhu (2020)
Investigation on Slicing Behavior of Single Crystal Silicon Wafer in AWJM and Influence of Micro Dimple Textured Surface for Solar ApplicationsSilicon, 13
N. Pradeep, K. Sundaram, M. Kumar (2019)
Multi-response optimization of electrochemical micromachining parameters for SS304 using polymer graphite electrode with NaNO3 electrolyte based on TOPSIS techniqueJournal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 41
N. Yuvaraj, M. Kumar (2018)
Optimisation of abrasive water jet cutting process parameters for AA5083-H32 aluminium alloy using fuzzy TOPSIS methodInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 20
ND Chakladar, S Chakraborty (2008)
A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selectionProc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf, 222
T. Geethapriyan, T. Muthuramalingam, K. Kalaichelvan (2019)
Influence of Process Parameters on Machinability of Inconel 718 by Electrochemical Micromachining Process using TOPSIS TechniqueArabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44
M Behzadian, SK Otaghsara, M Yazdani, J Ignatius (2012)
Expert Systems with Applications A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applicationsExpert Syst Appl, 39
W. Whittington, A. Oppedal, S. Turnage, Y. Hammi, H. Rhee, P. Allison, C. Crane, M. Horstemeyer (2014)
Capturing the effect of temperature, strain rate, and stress state on the plasticity and fracture of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) steelMaterials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 594
DL Olson (2004)
Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models, Mathematical and Computer ModellingMath Comput Model, 40
H. Nguyen, V. Pham, N. Ngo (2018)
Application of TOPSIS to Taguchi method for multi-characteristic optimization of electrical discharge machining with titanium powder mixed into dielectric fluidThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 98
Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA) is a high tensile strength, toughness, and hardness is widely used in defense battlefield vehicles. RHA is high-strength low alloy steel and it is best suited for all battlefield applications in defense vehicles as it withstands any projectile attack. The TOPSIS method was used in this study to conduct an experimental investigation of abrasive water jet machining (AWJM) cutting on RHA steel. Process parameters like jet water pressure (P), jet traverse rate (T), and standoff distance (SOD) are optimized with multiresponse output characteristics such as kerf angle (Ka), material removal mate (MRR), and surface roughness (Ra). The experiments are conducted under L27 factorial design, and Simos’ weightage approach is used to calculate the weight of the output parameter. The ANOVA test is employed to determine the level of contribution of each input parameter. The optimal closeness output response gives maximum MRR and minimum Ka and Ra values. T is the most influencing factor in the three output responses and SOD is the second influencing factor. The better optimal process parameter SOD = 1 mm, T = 5 mm/min and P = 240 MPa is identified using the TOPSIS method.
Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2021
Keywords: Armor steel; Machining; Optimization; ANOVA
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.