Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. L. Saaty (1990)
10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-IEuropean J. of Operational Res., 48
T. Saaty (1994)
Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 74
M. Liberatore (1987)
An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocationIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34
P. Harker, Luis Vargas (1990)
Reply to “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by J. S. DyerManagement Science, 36
T. Saaty (1986)
Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy processManagement Science, 32
J. Dyer (1990)
A clarification of “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”Management Science, 36
T. Saaty (1990)
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy ProcessInterfaces, 24
V. Lai, Bo Wong, Waiman Cheung (2002)
Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selectionEur. J. Oper. Res., 137
Stan Schenkerman (1994)
Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support modelsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 74
Michael Shellenbarger (1991)
Tuck pointing history and confusion.APT Bulletin, 23
V. Belton, T. Gear (1983)
On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchiesOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 11
J. Korpela, M. Tuominen (1996)
Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy processIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43
Luis Vargas (1994)
Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support modelsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 74
A. Arbel, Yair Orgler (1990)
An application of the AHP to bank strategic planning: The mergers and acquisitions processEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 48
T. Saaty (1990)
An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”Management Science, 36
J. Dyer (1990)
Remarks on the analytic hierarchy processManagement Science, 36
E. Triantaphyllou, S. Mann (1989)
An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradoxDecis. Support Syst., 5
P. Harker, Luis Vargas (1987)
The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy processManagement Science, 33
In many engineering applications, the final decision is based on the evaluation of a number of alternatives in terms of a number of criteria. This problem may become very intricate when the selection criteria are expressed in terms of different units or the pertinent data are difficult to be quantified. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an effective way in dealing with such kind of complicated problems. Cotton fiber is selected or graded, in the spinning industries, based on several quality criteria. However, the existing selection or grading method based on Fiber quality Index (FqI) is rather crude and ambiguous. This paper presents a novel approach of cotton fiber selection using the AHP methodology of Multi Criteria Decision Making.
Fibers and Polymers – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process; Cotton fiber; Elongation; Micronaire; Tenacity; Uniformity index; Upper half mean length
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.