Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Anesthesia Technique and Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Anesthesia Technique and Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Anesthetic techniques vary widely in the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using local anesthesia. However, the ideal anesthetic technique has not been determined. This study examines whether anesthesic technique influences the outcomes of EVAR. Data regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural characteristics, recovery characteristics, treatment complications, acute (<30 day) medical complications, mortality, and anesthetic type were prospectively collected during the AneuRx phase II aortic endograft trial. Patient cohorts receiving general, regional, or local anesthesia were compared. From 1997 to 1998, 424 patients underwent EVAR at 13 sites using the AneuRx Bifurcated endograft. There were 279 patients in the general anesthesia group, 95 patients in the regional group, and 50 patients in the local group. Risk factors were similar. There were no significant differences in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, length of anesthesia, branch artery occlusions, proximal endoleaks, failed implants, or open surgical conversions. Cardiac, renal, and wound-healing complications were all lower in the local group. Mortality was equivalent among the three groups. (p > 0.05, ANOVA). From these results we concluded that EVAR with local anesthesia is a safe and efficacious method that may reduce recovery times and postoperative medical morbidity compared to use of genera1 or spinal/epidural anesthesia. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Vascular Surgery Springer Journals

Anesthesia Technique and Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/anesthesia-technique-and-outcomes-of-endovascular-aneurysm-repair-2eoiryKmt8

References (32)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Abdominal Surgery
ISSN
0890-5096
eISSN
1615-5947
DOI
10.1007/s10016-004-0138-y
pmid
15714381
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Anesthetic techniques vary widely in the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using local anesthesia. However, the ideal anesthetic technique has not been determined. This study examines whether anesthesic technique influences the outcomes of EVAR. Data regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural characteristics, recovery characteristics, treatment complications, acute (<30 day) medical complications, mortality, and anesthetic type were prospectively collected during the AneuRx phase II aortic endograft trial. Patient cohorts receiving general, regional, or local anesthesia were compared. From 1997 to 1998, 424 patients underwent EVAR at 13 sites using the AneuRx Bifurcated endograft. There were 279 patients in the general anesthesia group, 95 patients in the regional group, and 50 patients in the local group. Risk factors were similar. There were no significant differences in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, length of anesthesia, branch artery occlusions, proximal endoleaks, failed implants, or open surgical conversions. Cardiac, renal, and wound-healing complications were all lower in the local group. Mortality was equivalent among the three groups. (p > 0.05, ANOVA). From these results we concluded that EVAR with local anesthesia is a safe and efficacious method that may reduce recovery times and postoperative medical morbidity compared to use of genera1 or spinal/epidural anesthesia.

Journal

Annals of Vascular Surgery – Springer Journals

Published: Jan 11, 2005

There are no references for this article.