Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Landman (1988)
Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13
R. Wiener, M. Gaborit, Christine Pritchard, Erin McDonough, Caryn Staebler, D. Wiley, K. Goldkamp (1994)
Counterfactual thinking in mock juror assessments of negligence: A preliminary investigationBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 12
Scott Hawkins, R. Hastie (1990)
Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.Psychological Bulletin, 107
C. Macrae, A. Milne (1992)
A Curry for Your Thoughts: Empathic Effects on Counterfactual ThinkingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18
Jonathan Casper, Kennette Benedict, Joseph Perry (1989)
Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight biasLaw and Human Behavior, 13
G. Wells, Igor Gavanski (1989)
Mental Simulation of CausalityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56
G. Bodenhausen (1990)
Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court casesJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 20
D. Wasserman, Richard Lempert, R. Hastie (1991)
Hindsight and CausalityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17
Dale Miller, W. Turnbull, C. McFarland (1990)
Counterfactual thinking and social perception : thinking about what might have beenAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23
C. Macrae, A. Milne, Riana Griffiths (1993)
Counterfactual thinking and the perception of criminal behaviourBritish Journal of Psychology, 84
Christopher Williams, P. Lees-Haley, Richard Brown (1993)
Human Response to Traumatic Events: An Integration of Counterfactual Thinking, Hindsight Bias, and Attribution TheoryPsychological Reports, 72
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
F. Gleicher, K. Kost, S. Baker, A. Strathman, Steven Richman, S. Sherman (1990)
The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of AffectPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
M. G. Ledwin (1988)
The use of the drug courier profile in traffic stops: Valid police practice or Fourth Amendment violation?Ohio Northern University Law Review, 15
B. Fischhoff (1975)
Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertaintyJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1
C. Macrae (1992)
A Tale of Two Curries: Counterfactual Thinking and Accident-Related JudgmentsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18
J. Landman (1987)
Regret and Elation Following Action and InactionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13
D. T. Miller, C. McFarland (1986)
Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theoryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12
K. Fiedler, J. Forgas (1991)
Affect Cognition and Social Behavior: New Evidence and Integrative Attempts
D. Kahneman, Dale Miller (1986)
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternativesPsychological Review, 93
D. Patton (1988)
Miles of white lines: Use of the drug courier profile by state law enforcement agencies on the highway as reasonable suspicion to detain motoristsArizona Law Review, 30
Dale Miller, C. McFarland (1986)
Counterfactual Thinking and Victim CompensationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12
J. W. Hall (1994)
Search and seizure
Baruch Fischhoff, R. Beyth (1975)
I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future thingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13
E. Greene (1989)
On Juries and Damage Awards: The Process of DecisionmakingLaw and contemporary problems, 52
Morgan Cloud (1985)
Search and Seizure by the Numbers: The Drug Courier Profile and Judicial Review of Investigative Formulas
Baruch Fischhoff (1975)
Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1
H. Bernstein, D. Horowitz, David Lange, H. Powell, Melvin Shimm, J. Weistart, R. Danner, Claire Germain, B. Baccari, Lisa Eichhorn, James Farrin, K. Cashion, Steven Chabinsky, Thomas Contois, James Glenister, Stephen Armitage, J. Cannon, C. Connolly, David Dabbs, Katherine Flanagan, P. Franklin, Donald Nielsen, Christopher Hart, Charles North, William O'Neil, Jane Schaefer, Eric Lieberman, Janet Moore, A. Walsh, Raymond Wierciszewski (1990)
LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS
Counterfactual thinking and hindsight bias have each generated separate, substantial bodies of research and provided insight into some areas of legal decision-making. An investigation of the relationship between Counterfactual thinking and hindsight bias in a situation in which both are implicated is presented in a legal decision-making context utilizing drug courier profiles and illegal search and seizure. The findings, which demonstrate each of these cognitive processes and show a pattern of results that supports an integrative relationship between them, are discussed in the contexts of social cognition and of legal decision-making. A suggested causal model of decision-making in this context is also presented. Specific implications of these findings for civil actions to remedy illegal searches are discussed.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 19, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.