Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Olds (1952)
A Note on the Convolution of Uniform DistributionsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 23
O. Nielsen (2000)
A Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model Considering Differences in Passengers Utility Functions
D. Watling, T. Rasmussen, Carlo Prato, O. Nielsen (2018)
Stochastic user equilibrium with a bounded choice modelTransportation Research Part B: Methodological
O. Nielsen, R. Frederiksen (2006)
Optimisation of timetable-based, stochastic transit assignment models based on MSAAnnals of Operations Research, 144
N. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (2009)
Schedule-based modeling of transportation networks : theory and applications
M Florian (2004)
Schedule-based dynamic transit modeling: theory and applications
D Kahneman, A Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under riskEconometrica, 47
Carlo Prato (2009)
Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directionsJournal of choice modelling, 2
Yulin Liu, J. Bunker, L. Ferreira (2010)
Transit Users’ Route‐Choice Modelling in Transit Assignment: A ReviewTransport Reviews, 30
K. Noekel, S. Wekeck (2007)
Choice models in frequency-based transit assignment
(1995)
Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance
M. Florian (2004)
Finding Shortest Time-Dependent Paths in Schedule-Based Transit Networks: A Label Setting Algorithm
Markus Friedrich, I. Hofsäß, S. Wekeck (2001)
Timetable-Based Transit Assignment Using Branch and Bound TechniquesTransportation Research Record, 1752
G. Gentile, K. Noekel (2016)
Modelling Public Transport Passenger Flows in the Era of Intelligent Transport Systems
K. Train (2003)
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation by Kenneth E. Train
Jan-Dirk Schmöcker, Hiroshi Shimamoto, F. Kurauchi (2013)
Generation and calibration of transit hyperpathsTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 36
M. Anderson, O. Nielsen, Carlo Prato (2017)
Multimodal route choice models of public transport passengers in the Greater Copenhagen AreaEURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 6
Jesper Ingvardson, Otto Nielsen, S. Raveau, Bo Nielsen (2018)
Passenger arrival and waiting time distributions dependent on train service frequency and station characteristics: A smart card data analysisTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 90
The model considers a day with normal operations and is therefore not applicable for days with major incidents in the network
S. Hoogendoorn-Lanser, P. Bovy, R. Nes (2007)
Application of Constrained Enumeration Approach to Multimodal Choice Set GenerationTransportation Research Record, 2014
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Decision, probability, and utility: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
C. Chriqui, P. Robillard (1975)
Common Bus LinesTransportation Science, 9
E. Cascetta, P. Coppola (2016)
Assessment of schedule-based and frequency-based assignment models for strategic and operational planning of high-speed rail servicesTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 84
KE Train (2002)
Discrete choice methods with simulation
J. Cea, E. Fernández (1993)
Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport Systems: An Equilibrium ModelTransp. Sci., 27
Morten Eltved
I. Constantin, M. Florian, H. Spiess (2002)
Deterministic Time Table Transit Assignment
This paper presents an assignment modeling framework for public transport networks with co-existing schedule- and frequency-based services. The paper develops, applies and discusses a joint model, which aims at representing the behavior of passengers as realistically as possible. The model consists of a choice set generation phase followed by a multinomial logit route choice model and assignment of flow to the generated alternatives. The choice set generation uses an event dominance principle to exclude alternatives with costs above a certain cost threshold. Furthermore, a heuristic for aggregating overlapping lines is proposed. The results from applying the model to a case study in the Greater Copenhagen Area show that the level of service obtained in the unified network model of mixed services is placed between the level of service for strictly schedule-based and strictly frequency-based networks. The results also show that providing timetable information to the passengers improve their utility function as compared to only providing information on frequencies.
EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 23, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.