Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Rosenberg, D. Francis, Craig Hullet, Z. Morris, J. Brower, B. Anderson, K. Bradley, M. Bassetti, R. Kimple (2017)
Online patient information from radiation oncology departments is too complex for the general population.Practical radiation oncology, 7 1
G. Harry, Mc Laughlin (1969)
SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula.The Journal of Reading
Kenneth Lee, Kreshnik Hoti, J. Hughes, L. Emmerton (2014)
Dr Google and the Consumer: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Navigational Needs and Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviors of Consumers With Chronic Health ConditionsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 16
(2012)
Search engine use 2012
R. Gunning (1969)
The Fog Index After Twenty YearsJournal of Business Communication, 6
Maryam Kamvar, S. Baluja (2006)
A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google mobile searchProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
How to write easy to read health materials
Linda Fu, Kathleen Zook, Zachary Spoehr-Labutta, Pamela Hu, J. Joseph (2016)
Search Engine Ranking, Quality, and Content of Web Pages That Are Critical Versus Noncritical of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 58 1
(2016)
Health literacy to promote quality of care . Committee Opinion No . 676
S. Azer, Maha Alghofaili, Rana Alsultan, Najla Alrumaih (2017)
Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder CancersJournal of Cancer Education, 33
American Cancer (2016) Cancer Facts and Figures
E Dale, JS Chall (1948)
A formula for predicting readability: instructionsEduc Res Bull, 27
(2010)
Simply put a guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. Strategic and Proactive Communication Branch 3
E. Dale, J. Chall (1948)
A FORMULA FOR PREDICTING READABILITY
P. Ingledew, D. El-Zammar, Elena Scali, B. Brar, J. Lin, Irene Yu, E. Gusnowski (2014)
Caught in the Web: The Quality of Online Resources for Cancer PatientsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 90
Fitzsimmons Pr, Benedict Michael, Hulley Jl, Scott Go (2010)
A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information.The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 40 4
D. Friedman, L. Hoffman‐Goetz (2006)
A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer InformationHealth Education & Behavior, 33
Lee Rainie (2012)
A Biography of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project
MC Freda, K Damus, IR Merkatz (1999)
Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphletsObstet Gynecol, 93
M. Freda, Karla Damus, I. Merkatz (1999)
Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Obstetrics and gynecology, 93 5 Pt 1
Eline Schreuders, E. Grobbee, E. Kuipers, M. Spaander, S. Zanten (2017)
Variable Quality and Readability of Patient‐oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer ScreeningClinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 15
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
P. Kincaid, R. Fishburne, R. Rogers, B. Chissom (1975)
Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel
J. McLeod, Irene Yu, P. Ingledew (2016)
Peering into the Deep: Characterizing the Internet Search Patterns of Patients with Gynecologic CancersJournal of Cancer Education, 32
(2015)
Americans’ Internet access
(2016)
Core (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna URL https://www.R-project.org
Mazin Baazeem, H. Abenhaim (2014)
Google and Women’s Health-Related Issues: What Does the Search Engine Data Reveal?Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 6
The Internet is a major source of health information for gynecologic cancer patients. In this study, we systematically explore common Google search terms related to gynecologic cancer and calculate readability of top resulting websites. We used Google AdWords Keyword Planner to generate a list of commonly searched keywords related to gynecologic oncology, which were sorted into five groups (cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer) using five patient education websites from sgo.org . Each keyword was Google searched to create a list of top websites. The Python programming language (version 3.5.1) was used to describe frequencies of keywords, top-level domains (TLDs), domains, and readability of top websites using four validated formulae. Of the estimated 1,846,950 monthly searches resulting in 62,227 websites, the most common was cancer.org . The most common TLD was *.com. Most websites were above the eighth-grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH). The SMOG Index was the most reliable formula. The mean grade level readability for all sites using SMOG was 9.4 ± 2.3, with 23.9% of sites falling at or below the eighth-grade reading level. The first ten results for each Google keyword were easiest to read with results beyond the first page of Google being consistently more difficult. Keywords related to gynecologic malignancies are Google-searched frequently. Most websites are difficult to read without a high school education. This knowledge may help gynecologic oncology providers adequately meet the needs of their patients.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 20, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.