Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
DL Alden, J Friend, M Schapira, A Stiggelbout (2014)
Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groupsSoc Sci Med, 105
JD Tariman, DL Berry, B Cochrane, A Doorenbos, K Schepp (2010)
Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic reviewAnn Oncol, 21
HB Neuman, ME Charlson, LK Temple (2007)
Is there a role for decision aids in cancer-related decisions?Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 62
C Charles, A Gafni, T Whelan (1999)
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making modelSoc Sci Med, 49
RM Epstein, RE Gramling (2013)
What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclearMed Care Res Rev, 70
BJ Davison, LF Degner, TR Morgan (1995)
Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancerOncol Nurs Forum, 22
NK Arora, KE Weaver, ML Clayman, I Oakley-Girvan, AL Potosky (2009)
Physicians’ decision-making style and psychosocial outcomes among cancer survivorsPatient Educ Couns, 77
AT Berman, SA Rosenthal, D Moghanaki (2016)
Focusing on the “person” in personalized medicine: the future of patient-centered care in radiation oncologyJ Am Coll Radiol, 13
HL Shepherd, PN Butow, MHN Tattersall (2011)
Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisionsPatient Educ Couns, 84
N Zdenkowski, P Butow, S Tesson, F Boyle (2016)
A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancerBreast, 26
G Elwyn, A O’Connor, D Stacey (2006)
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus processBMJ, 333
M Gattellari, PN Butow, MHN Tattersall (2001)
Sharing decisions in cancer careSoc Sci Med, 52
D Stacey, R Samant, C Bennett (2008)
Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participationCA Cancer J Clin, 58
MA O’Brien, TJ Whelan, M Vilhsis-Keever (2009)
Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysisJ Clin Oncol, 27
SJ Katz, S Hawley (2013)
The value of sharing treatment decision making with patients: expecting too much?JAMA, 310
L Levit, E Balogh, S Nass, PA Ganz (2013)
Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis
A Coulter, D Stilwell, J Kryworuchko, PD Mullen, CJ Ng, T Weijden (2013)
A systematic development process for patient decision aidsBMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 13
E Szumacher, H Llewellyn-Thomas, E Franssen (2005)
Treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy: patients’ treatment preferencesInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 61
J Wong, E Szumacher (2012)
Patients’ decision-making in radiation oncologyExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 12
RF Obeidat, GG Homish, RM Lally (2013)
Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature reviewOncol Nurs Forum, 40
AM O’Connor, V Fiset, C DeGrasse (1999)
Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implicationsJ Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 25
A Herrmann, E Mansfield, AE Hall, R Sanson-Fisher, N Zdenkowski (2016)
Wilfully out of sight? A literature review on the effectiveness of cancer-related decision aids and implementation strategiesBMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 16
EL Mead, AZ Doorenbos, SH Javid (2013)
Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic reviewAm J Public Health, 103
CN Coleman (2002)
Radiation oncology--linking technology and biology in the treatment of cancerActa Oncol, 41
LF Degner, LJ Kristjanson, D Bowman (1997)
Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancerJAMA, 277
Cancer treatment decisions are complex and may be challenging for patients, as multiple treatment options can often be reasonably considered. As a result, decisional support tools have been developed to assist patients in the decision-making process. A commonly used intervention to facilitate shared decision-making is a decision aid, which provides evidence-based outcomes information and guides patients towards choosing the treatment option that best aligns with their preferences and values. To ensure high quality, systematic frameworks and standards have been proposed for the development of an optimal aid for decision making. Studies have examined the impact of these tools on facilitating treatment decisions and improving decision-related outcomes. In radiation oncology, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that decision aids have the potential to improve patient outcomes, including increased knowledge about treatment options and decreased decisional conflict with decision-making. This article provides an overview of the shared-decision making process and summarizes the development, validation, and implementation of decision aids as patient educational tools in radiation oncology. Finally, this article reviews the findings from decision aid studies in radiation oncology and offers various strategies to effectively implement shared decision-making into clinical practice.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 30, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.