Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2001)
Gap Forcing”, Israel
M. Magidor, S. Shelah (1995)
The tree property at successors of singular cardinalsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 35
U. Abraham (1983)
Aronszajn trees on aleph2 and aleph3Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 24
J. Hamkins (1998)
Gap forcingIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 125
The Tree Property at ℵ ω+1 " , submitted for publication to the Journal of Symbolic Logic
Arthur Apter (1985)
Some results on consecutive large cardinals II: Applications of radin forcingIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 52
(2003)
Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded
Dima Sinapova (2012)
The tree property at ℵω+1The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 77
R. Schindler (1997)
Weak covering and the tree propertyArchive for Mathematical Logic, 38
D. Busche, R. Schindler (2009)
The strength of choiceless patterns of singular and weakly compact cardinalsAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 159
M. Foreman, M. Magidor, R. Schindler (2001)
The consistency strength of successive cardinals with the tree propertyJournal of Symbolic Logic, 66
Arthur Apter (1983)
Some results on consecutive large cardinalsAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 25
(1983)
Aronszajn Trees on א2 and א3
J. Cummings, M. Foreman (1998)
The Tree PropertyAdvances in Mathematics, 133
J. Hamkins (1999)
Gap Forcing: Generalizing the Lévy-Solovay TheoremBulletin of Symbolic Logic, 5
J. Silver (1966)
Some applications of model theory in set theory
Azriel Levy, R. Solovay (1967)
Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesisIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 5
U. Abraham (1983)
Aronszajn trees on $${\aleph_2}$$ and $${\aleph_3}$$Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 24
W. Mitchell (1972)
Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer propertyAnnals of Mathematical Logic, 5
U. Abraham (1983)
Aronszajn trees on aleph 2 and aleph 3 ., 24
R. Laver (1978)
Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcingIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 29
Arthur Apter (1992)
Some new upper bounds in consistency strength for certain choiceless large cardinal patternsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 31
We show that the consistency of the theory “ZF + DC + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” follows from the consistency of a proper class of supercompact cardinals. This extends earlier results due to the author showing that the consistency of the theory “ $${{\rm ZF} + \neg{\rm AC}_\omega}$$ + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” follows from hypotheses stronger in consistency strength than a supercompact limit of supercompact cardinals. A lower bound in consistency strength is provided by a result of Busche and Schindler, who showed that the consistency of the theory “ZF + Every successor cardinal is regular + Every limit cardinal is singular + Every successor cardinal satisfies the tree property” implies the consistency of AD L(R).
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.