Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Leila Amgoud, N. Maudet, S. Parsons (2000)
Modelling dialogues using argumentationProceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems
J. Pollock (1992)
How to Reason DefeasiblyArtif. Intell., 57
Fangzhen Lin, Y. Shoham (1989)
Argument Systems: A Uniform Basis for Nonmonotonic Reasoning
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
G. Brewka (1994)
Reasoning about Priorities in Default Logic
Leila Amgoud, C. Cayrol (1998)
On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-based Argumentation
(2000)
A dialogue framework based on argumentation
Cayrol / A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments 215
Guillermo Simari, R. Loui (1992)
A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its ImplementationArtif. Intell., 53
G. Vreeswijk (1997)
Abstract Argumentation SystemsArtif. Intell., 90
(2000)
An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1997)
Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible PrioritiesJ. Appl. Non Class. Logics, 7
J. Kohlas, D. Berzati, R. Haenni (2002)
Probabilistic Argumentation Systems and AbductionAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 34
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
Gadi Pinkas, R. Loui (1992)
Reasoning from Inconsistency: A Taxonomy of Principles for Resolving Conflict
M. Elvang-Gøransson, P. Krause, J. Fox (1993)
Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent informationArXiv, abs/1303.1467
Leila Amgoud, C. Cayrol, Daniel Berre (1996)
Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoningProceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
C. Cayrol, V. Royer, C. Saurel (1992)
Management of Preferences in Assumption-Based Reasoning
(1994)
Logic programming as dialogue games
M. Elvang-Gøransson, P. Krause, J. Fox (1993)
Acceptability of arguments as 'logical uncertainty'
Leïla Amgoud (1999)
Contribution a l'integration des preferences dans le raisonnement argumentatif
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1995)
On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities
P. Dung (1993)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming
Leila Amgoud, C. Cayrol (1997)
Integrating Preference Orderings into Argument-Based Reasoning
M. Elvang-Gøransson, A. Hunter (1995)
Argumentative Logics: Reasoning with Classically Inconsistent InformationData Knowl. Eng., 16
G. Vreeswijk (1991)
The Feasibility of Defeat in Defeasible Reasoning
Leila Amgoud, S. Parsons, N. Maudet (2000)
Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction of arguments and counter-arguments (or defeaters) followed by the selection of the most acceptable of them. In this paper, we refine the argumentation framework proposed by Dung by taking into account preference relations between arguments in order to integrate two complementary points of view on the concept of acceptability: acceptability based on the existence of direct counter-arguments and acceptability based on the existence of defenders. An argument is thus acceptable if it is preferred to its direct defeaters or if it is defended against its defeaters. This also refines previous works by Prakken and Sartor, by associating with each argument a notion of strength, while these authors embed preferences in the definition of the defeat relation. We propose a revised proof theory in terms of AND/OR trees, verifying if a given argument is acceptable, which better reflects the dialectical form of argumentation.
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 10, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.