Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A philosophy of reviewing: Taking cues from Henry James

A philosophy of reviewing: Taking cues from Henry James A Philosophy of Reviewing: Taking Cues From Henry James Cheryl Nakata University of Illinois at Chicago More than a century ago, Henry James authored The takes cues from Henry James and has evolved from personal Golden Bowl, The Portrait of a Lady, and The Wings of the and shared experiences in reviewing as well as receiving re- Dove--said to be the finest American prose fiction ever views from academic journals and conferences. written (Bloom 2002:748). These novels are enthusiasti- The first aspect, or assumption, of this philosophy is cally read and appreciated to this day, reflecting not only respect. Just as James describes a high regard for the critic James's innate artistry but also his development as a writer and presumably the critic for the writer, so must respect in response to critiques of his work. He once commented characterize the relationship between marketing about the indispensable and unique role of critics in this researcher and reviewer. Under time pressures, a reviewer way: can be tempted to dash off a terse, superficial commentary on a paper that crosses the desk. However, doing so con- The critical sense is so far from frequent that it is ab- veys a rather http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Springer Journals

A philosophy of reviewing: Taking cues from Henry James

Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-philosophy-of-reviewing-taking-cues-from-henry-james-OUNam6BUXs

References (4)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of Marketing Science 2003
Subject
Economics / Management Science; Business/Management Science, general; Marketing; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0092-0703
eISSN
1552-7824
DOI
10.1177/0092070303031003017
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A Philosophy of Reviewing: Taking Cues From Henry James Cheryl Nakata University of Illinois at Chicago More than a century ago, Henry James authored The takes cues from Henry James and has evolved from personal Golden Bowl, The Portrait of a Lady, and The Wings of the and shared experiences in reviewing as well as receiving re- Dove--said to be the finest American prose fiction ever views from academic journals and conferences. written (Bloom 2002:748). These novels are enthusiasti- The first aspect, or assumption, of this philosophy is cally read and appreciated to this day, reflecting not only respect. Just as James describes a high regard for the critic James's innate artistry but also his development as a writer and presumably the critic for the writer, so must respect in response to critiques of his work. He once commented characterize the relationship between marketing about the indispensable and unique role of critics in this researcher and reviewer. Under time pressures, a reviewer way: can be tempted to dash off a terse, superficial commentary on a paper that crosses the desk. However, doing so con- The critical sense is so far from frequent that it is ab- veys a rather

Journal

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2003

Keywords: Literary Criticism; Innate Artistry; Marketing Research; Prose; Critical Sense

There are no references for this article.