Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Ciocarlie, Kaijen Hsiao, E. Jones, Sachin Chitta, R. Rusu, I. Sucan (2010)
Towards Reliable Grasping and Manipulation in Household Environments
B. Burns, O. Brock (2007)
Sampling-Based Motion Planning With Sensing UncertaintyProceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Sam Prentice, N. Roy (2009)
The Belief Roadmap: Efficient Planning in Belief Space by Factoring the CovarianceThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 28
J Lrdg, M. Lengyel, B. Reichert, P. Donald, Greenberg, T Lpw, M. Erez, An, Hst, T. Horsch, F. Schwarz, References Atbm, J Ahuactzin, E.-G. Talbi, P. Bessì, E. Mazer, P Ch, Y. Chen, Hwang, Sandros (1996)
Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning in High-Dimensional Con(cid:12)guration Spaces
J. Berg, P. Abbeel, Ken Goldberg (2011)
LQG-MP: Optimized path planning for robots with motion uncertainty and imperfect state informationThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 30
Jing Yang, Patrick Dymond, M. Jenkin (2011)
Exploiting Hierarchical Probabilistic Motion Planning for Robot Reachable Workspace Estimation
David Hsu, J. Latombe, H. Kurniawati (2006)
On the Probabilistic Foundations of Probabilistic Roadmap PlanningThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 25
(1978)
M87) received the B.Tech. degree from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India, in 1978, and the M.Eng. and Ph.D
A. Hornung, Kai Wurm, Maren Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, Wolfram Burgard (2013)
OctoMap: an efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octreesAutonomous Robots, 34
I. Sucan, Mark Moll, L. Kavraki (2012)
The Open Motion Planning LibraryIEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19
Yifeng Huang, K. Gupta (2008)
RRT-SLAM for motion planning with motion and map uncertainty for robot exploration2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
A. Lambert, D. Gruyer (2003)
Safe path planning in an uncertain-configuration space2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422), 3
Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Eric Berger, Tully Foote, Brian Gerkey, K. Konolige (2010)
The Office Marathon: Robust navigation in an indoor office environment2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
D. Berenson, J. Kuffner, H. Choset (2008)
An optimization approach to planning for mobile manipulation2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Zhenwang Yao, K. Gupta (2007)
Path planning with general end-effector constraintsRobotics Auton. Syst., 55
(2008)
A framework for planningmotions in stochasticmaps
Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi, S. Chakravorty, N. Amato (2014)
FIRM: Sampling-based feedback motion-planning under motion uncertainty and imperfect measurementsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 33
S. LaValle (1998)
Rapidly-exploring random trees : a new tool for path planningThe annual research report
Jonathan Scholz, Sachin Chitta, B. Marthi, M. Likhachev (2011)
Cart pushing with a mobile manipulation system: Towards navigation with moveable objects2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
A. Hornung, Maren Bennewitz (2012)
Adaptive level-of-detail planning for efficient humanoid navigation2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Robert Platt, Russ Tedrake, L. Kaelbling, Tomas Lozano-Perez (2010)
Belief space planning assuming maximum likelihood observations, 06
Joelle Pineau, G. Gordon, S. Thrun (2003)
Point-based value iteration: An anytime algorithm for POMDPs
L. Kaelbling, M. Littman, A. Cassandra (1998)
Planning and Acting in Partially Observable Stochastic DomainsArtif. Intell., 101
Ashutosh Saxena, Justin Driemeyer, A. Ng (2008)
Robotic Grasping of Novel Objects using VisionThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 27
Patrycja Missiuro, N. Roy (2006)
Adapting probabilistic roadmaps to handle uncertain mapsProceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
Jindong Tan, N. Xi (2001)
Unified model approach for planning and control of mobile manipulatorsProceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164), 3
Yifeng Huang, K. Gupta (2009)
Collision-probability constrained PRM for a manipulator with base pose uncertainty2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
H. Tanner, K. Kyriakopoulos (2000)
Nonholonomic motion planning for mobile manipulatorsProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), 2
L. Torabi, M. Kazemi, K. Gupta (2007)
Configuration space based efficient view planning and exploration with occupancy grids2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Y. Yamamoto, X. Yun (1992)
Coordinating locomotion and manipulation of a mobile manipulator[1992] Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
Yuandong Yang, O. Brock (2010)
Elastic roadmaps—motion generation for autonomous mobile manipulationAutonomous Robots, 28
L. Guibas, David Hsu, H. Kurniawati, Ehsan-ur Rehman (2008)
Bounded Uncertainty Roadmaps for Path Planning
R. Rusu, Nico Blodow, Zoltán-Csaba Márton, M. Beetz (2009)
Close-range scene segmentation and reconstruction of 3D point cloud maps for mobile manipulation in domestic environments2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
N. Roy, S. Thrun (1999)
Coastal Navigation with Mobile Robots
H. Kurniawati, T. Bandyopadhyay, N. Patrikalakis (2011)
Global motion planning under uncertain motion, sensing, and environment mapAutonomous Robots, 33
Juan Gonzalez, A. Stentz (2005)
Planning with uncertainty in position an optimal and efficient planner2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Yong Yu, K. Gupta (2004)
C-space Entropy: A Measure for View Planning and Exploration for General Robot-Sensor Systems in Unknown EnvironmentsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 23
H. Kurniawati, Yanzhu Du, David Hsu, Wee Lee (2010)
Motion planning under uncertainty for robotic tasks with long time horizonsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 30
Zhenwang Yao, K. Gupta (2005)
Path planning with general end-effector constraints: using task space to guide configuration space search2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Mike Stilman (2007)
Task constrained motion planning in robot joint space2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Bertrand Bouilly, T. Siméon, R. Alami (1995)
A numerical technique for planning motion strategies of a mobile robot in presence of uncertaintyProceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2
R. Smallwood, E. Sondik (1973)
The Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Processes over a Finite HorizonOper. Res., 21
A. Lazanas, J. Latombe (1995)
Motion Planning with Uncertainty: A Landmark ApproachArtif. Intell., 76
Nik Melchior, R. Simmons (2007)
Particle RRT for Path Planning with UncertaintyProceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
A. Hornung, Mike Phillips, E. Jones, Maren Bennewitz, M. Likhachev, Sachin Chitta (2012)
Navigation in three-dimensional cluttered environments for mobile manipulation2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
(2005)
Principles of robot motion: Theory, algorithms, and implementations, chap
J. Kuffner, S. LaValle (2000)
RRT-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planningProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), 2
(2009)
ROS: An opensource robot operating system
John Vannoy, J. Xiao (2008)
Real-Time Adaptive Motion Planning (RAMP) of Mobile Manipulators in Dynamic Environments With Unforeseen ChangesIEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24
K. Gochev, A. Safonova, M. Likhachev (2012)
Planning with adaptive dimensionality for mobile manipulation2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
A. Monastero, P. Fiorini (2009)
Target pose computation for nonholonomic mobile manipulators2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics
Thierry Fraichard, R. Mermond (1998)
Path planning with uncertainty for car-like robotsProceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146), 1
We present a hierarchical and adaptive mobile manipulator planner (HAMP) that plans for both the base and the arm in a judicious manner—allowing the manipulator to change its configuration autonomously when needed if the current arm configuration is in collision with the environment as the mobile manipulator moves along the planned path. This is in contrast to current implemented approaches that are conservative and fold the arm into a fixed home configuration. Our planner first constructs a base roadmap and then for each node in the roadmap it checks for collision status of current manipulator configuration along the edges formed with adjacent nodes, if the current manipulator configuration is in collision, the manipulator C-space is searched for a new reachable configuration such that it is collision-free as the mobile manipulator moves along the edge and a path from current configuration to the new reachable configuration is computed. We show that HAMP is probabilistically complete. We compared HAMP with full 9D PRM and observed that the full 9D PRM is outperformed by HAMP in each of the performance criteria, i.e., computational time, percentage of successful attempts, base path length, and most importantly, undesired motions of the arm. We also evaluated the tree versions of HAMP, with RRT and bi-directional RRT as core underlying sub-planners, and observed similar advantages, although the time saving for bi-directional RRT version is modest. We then present an extension of HAMP (we call it HAMP-U) that uses belief space planning to account for localization uncertainty associated with the mobile base position and ensures that the resultant path for the mobile manipulator has low uncertainty at the goal. Our experimental results show that the paths generated by HAMP-U are less likely to result in collision and are safer to execute than those generated by HAMP (without incorporating uncertainty), thereby showing the importance of incorporating base pose uncertainty in our overall HAMP algorithm.
Autonomous Robots – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 20, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.