Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kagan (1965)
Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children.Child Development, 36
M. Kelly (1977)
A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 10 1
N. Salkind, John Wright (1977)
The Development of Reflection-Impulsivity and Cognitive EfficiencyHuman Development, 20
L. Feldt (1969)
A test of the hypothesis that cronbach's alpha or kuder-richardson coefficent twenty is the same for two testsPsychometrika, 34
J. Kagan, B. Rosman, Deborah Day, J. Albert, W. Phillips (1964)
Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes., 78
R. Hodge, Paul Siegel, P. Rossi (1964)
Occupational Prestige in the United States, 1925-63American Journal of Sociology, 70
S. Campbell, V. Douglas, G. Morgenstern (1971)
Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 12 1
A. Loper, D. Hallahan (1980)
A Comparison of Different Statistical Procedures for Determining the Relationship Between Cognitive Tempo and Reading AchievementJournal of General Psychology, 102
J. Block, J. Block, D. Harrington (1974)
Some Misgivings About the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a Measure of Reflection-Impulsivity.Developmental Psychology, 10
D. Cullinan, M. Epstein, J. Lloyd, M. Noel (1980)
Development of Cognitive Tempo in Learning Disabled and Normal ChildrenLearning Disability Quarterly, 3
E. Cairns, Tommy Cammock (1978)
Development of a More Reliable Version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Developmental Psychology, 14
D. Juliano (1974)
Conceptual tempo, activity, and concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of abnormal psychology, 83 6
R. Ault, C. Mitchell, D. Hartmann (1976)
Some Methodological Problems in Reflection-Impulsivity Research.Child Development, 47
D. Hallahan, J. Kauffman, D. Ball (1973)
Selective Attention and Cognitive Tempo of Low Achieving and High Achieving Sixth Grade MalesPerceptual and Motor Skills, 36
L. Cronbach (1951)
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 16
B. Egeland, R. Weinberg (1976)
The Matching Familiar Figures Test: A Look as Its Psychometric Credibility.Child Development, 47
S. Messer (1976)
Reflection-impulsivity: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 83
A direct comparison was made of the reliability and validity of the standard Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFF) to a recent longer version of the task (MFF20). Subjects comprised two samples of learning-disabled children, matched on age, sex, IQ, and SES. The Salkind and Wright (1977) formulation was used to generate continuous data, and IQ was statistically controlled. Internal reliability estimates showed the MFF20 to be more consistent that the standard version on both error and latency scores. Validity was addressed by comparing the two versions of the task in their ability to predict cognitive and behavioral skills of conceptual relevance to impulsivity. Results indicated that the MFF20 is a more sensitive predictor of academic achievement and attention as observed in a natural setting than is the standard version of the task.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.