Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Comparison of Academic Output Amongst Nations

A Comparison of Academic Output Amongst Nations Curr Radiol Rep (2016) 4:55 DOI 10.1007/s40134-016-0181-9 GLOBAL RADIOLOGY CONCERNS: INCOME, ACADEMICS, QUALITY, SAFETY (R SEMELKA, SECTION EDITOR) 1 1 Niyati Mukherjee Lauren Burke Published online: 22 August 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract Introduction Purpose of Review Although global biomedical research output is steadily increasing over time, individual nations Global biomedical research output increases yearly [1]. vary in their rates and directions of research growth. The This observation is true of most if not all subspecialties of purpose of this article is to review the existing bibliometric medicine, including radiology [2]. Although the overall literature within radiology to characterize differences in body of biomedical research is steadily increasing, nations national research output. and regions vary in their rates and directions of research Recent Findings The United States has historically and growth [1]. Various factors unique to each nation likely continues to publish the largest absolute number of radio- influence academic productivity, including funding, the logic research articles amongst all nations. However, many quality of the existing academic and research institutional European and Asian nations produce more research per framework, and academic culture and promotion criteria. capita, per radiologist, and per share of GDP spent on Global http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Current Radiology Reports Springer Journals

A Comparison of Academic Output Amongst Nations

Current Radiology Reports , Volume 4 (10) – Aug 22, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-comparison-of-academic-output-amongst-nations-WeFYGt3vxJ

References (15)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology
eISSN
2167-4825
DOI
10.1007/s40134-016-0181-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Curr Radiol Rep (2016) 4:55 DOI 10.1007/s40134-016-0181-9 GLOBAL RADIOLOGY CONCERNS: INCOME, ACADEMICS, QUALITY, SAFETY (R SEMELKA, SECTION EDITOR) 1 1 Niyati Mukherjee Lauren Burke Published online: 22 August 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract Introduction Purpose of Review Although global biomedical research output is steadily increasing over time, individual nations Global biomedical research output increases yearly [1]. vary in their rates and directions of research growth. The This observation is true of most if not all subspecialties of purpose of this article is to review the existing bibliometric medicine, including radiology [2]. Although the overall literature within radiology to characterize differences in body of biomedical research is steadily increasing, nations national research output. and regions vary in their rates and directions of research Recent Findings The United States has historically and growth [1]. Various factors unique to each nation likely continues to publish the largest absolute number of radio- influence academic productivity, including funding, the logic research articles amongst all nations. However, many quality of the existing academic and research institutional European and Asian nations produce more research per framework, and academic culture and promotion criteria. capita, per radiologist, and per share of GDP spent on Global

Journal

Current Radiology ReportsSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 22, 2016

There are no references for this article.