Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/a-comparative-study-of-by-products-yield-from-coke-making-processes-in-GoSbC9CM60
References (6)
-
R. Loison (2013)
Coke: Quality and Production -
(1963)
Chemistry of coal utilization, the com mittee on chemical utilization of division of chemistry and chemicals technology, National Reaction -
R. Haslam
Fuels and their combustion -
(1926)
Effect of sulfur on H2S yield -
(2006)
Assessment of the yield of by products during high temperature carbonization of coals -
P. Wilson, J. Wells (1950)
Coal, coke and coal chemicals
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2014 by Allerton Press, Inc.
- Subject
- Chemistry; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
- ISSN
- 1068-364X
- eISSN
- 1934-8398
- DOI
- 10.3103/S1068364X14050093
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Physico-chemical characteristics or the industrial behaviour of any coal is directly controlled by its organic micro-components (macerals). The yields of by-products during carbonization of coal are affected by organo micro-components of different coals and operating parameters, such as, charging technologies, carbonization temperature, particle size, bulk density, etc. In the present investigation, the effects of volatile matters (16.61–36.00%), Ro, avg. (0.80–1.36%), exinite (0.5–4.5%), hydrogen (4.34–5.29%) and nitrogen (1.60–2.18%) content of coal on yield of by-products, such as, coke oven gas, coal tar, ammonia, and hydrogen sulphide were studied. The studies revealed that there is a significant difference of the yield of by-products for the two different charging technologies. The coke oven gas, coal tar and ammonia yield was lower in stamp charging process as compared to top charging process, whereas, hydrogen sulphide yield followed a reverse trend.
Journal
Coke and Chemistry – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 23, 2014